Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)
Close reading of the corpus at each pipeline stage: raw → clean → relevant → coded.
4.3K
comments matched
· page 177 of 215
Logan Perkins Henderson Has ginger also. 😊
STACK
Automatic switching without using our brains is just...
The real competition isn't better AI anymore it's fewer tabs, fewer tools, and less friction. Simple wins. 🚀
AI is handicapping Mankind to think critical and learn or do things by own, It's weakening the human mind capabilities as it is allowing Today not to learn or do a thing which takes effort n time; crack anything you want to just with a prompt. It's a technology weapon- a modern way to let Powerful Developed countries make other countries slave and let them buy AI products n tools from them. Harsh n bitter truth of AI which sooner or later gonna impact everybody's life.
AI in research should feel like an AGI as removing the human from the loop might not be possible in a next few years yet but AI should have abilities to perform things in sandbox and make autonomous dicisions to get better observation
Because AI does not make condescending comments or downvotes people when you ask questions.
This is a total game-changer. Looking forward to watching the broader industry adoption
STACK
The decline in Stack Overflow usage does not necessarily mean the end of learning, but it does reveal a profound shift in how developers seek knowledge. AI accelerates answers, but the real differentiator will remain understanding the problem, validating solutions, and knowing how to ask the right questions. Tools change; critical thinking remains indispensable.
Definitely, there is value in shortening various research activities and making them more cost-effective……and yes, human judgment stays critical as well as « intentionally » managing different risks .
The real moat may no longer be the model itself. It may be the ability to reduce friction between intent and execution. The winners will likely be the platforms that make complexity disappear.
Frederic Lhoest you're right but we're humans training the AI by giving prompts and it's getting better day by day. Our prompts helping the AI systems to perform well. Now prompts are the source.
Stack-Overflow needs to be supported ! AI Models / LLMs are like Google. Still Stack-Overflow lets you Interact. Let Stack-Overflow Integrates its Plaform with AI. And let Stack-Overflow keeps it data Away from AI access.
AI won't replace curiosity or creativity, but it can reduce the friction between an idea and its exploration. When researchers can test more hypotheses and explore more unconventional paths, breakthroughs that once seemed out of reach may become possible.
AI can generate errors or security flaws, and iterate to solve a complex problem, generating more errors, without adequate understanding from the developer. SO operates based on real-world experience, so they shouldn't disappear; their combination is key to success.
Frigtening and quite obvious AI Eyeopener(s)... ✅️ 😟
This looks transient to me .
Relying too much on AI gonna backfire job seekers only, yea once you get the job it feels good that AI gets your task done easily, but what if companies start adopting Face to face interviews? The more you rely on AI the more companies will prefer using AI over living humans.
Srishtee Dureja The cognitive dependency argument is the one I take most seriously in this entire debate.
But here's where I'd push back slightly — the same critique was made about books, calculators, and search engines. Each time, the people who learned to use the tool well pulled further ahead. The ones who avoided it didn't preserve their edge. They just fell behind differently.
AI is the same test, just at a higher stakes level.