Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

This is really a great find👍🏻😎

AI for research. Is very good field

Chat gdp Ai lies and directs you away from the truth or facts while gemeni tells you the entire truth at the beginning

This resonates deeply. AI’s greatest value may not be replacing researchers, clinicians, or builders — it may be reducing the friction between insight and execution. The ability to test “crazier” paths matters because many breakthroughs begin as ideas that are too expensive, too slow, or too risky to explore under traditional constraints. At Pocono AI, that same principle drives how we think about regulated industries: AI should expand what humans can safely attempt, while preserving the evidence trail, governance, and accountability behind every decision. The future is not just faster answers. It is more room to think, test, verify, and build responsibly.

What stood out to me here is a subtle but powerful idea: AI may not be most valuable for generating answers. It may be most valuable for expanding the space of ideas humans can explore. Many important discoveries never fail because they’re wrong. They fail because they’re too time-consuming, too complex, or too uncertain to pursue. If AI can reduce that cognitive friction, researchers may be able to test more hypotheses, explore less obvious paths, and preserve more of the reasoning behind discovery itself. The long-term opportunity may not be automating research. It may be enabling deeper curiosity, creativity, and scientific exploration at a scale that was previously impractical. Looking forward to seeing how this evolves across mathematics, science, and innovation.

150 applications without response, is normal for many jobs, with or without AI. Graduates with experience may expect 100+ applications before they land the right one. What more the fresh graduates. So if you ask me, it is not entirely about AI. More about persistence and grit rhat is lacking.

A real problem indeed! Friends of mine in software development who have lost their jobs are leveraging InsiderChimp to get an early warning of the companies considering posting a position (but have not) where they have an insider connection who can get them early access to the final decision makers. I built InsiderChimp https://insider.blue-chimp.com to find myself a job using intent data. It worked and I got a full time offer. Intent data tells you when a company is searching for a skill or a contractor or an employee before posting a position It gives you an edge that is desperately needed in this market

Generating power from human pedaling bikes all day just to charge a phone. Bua ha ha!

Matthew Kilkenny ,I am not looking at this through a religious lens, but through a human and ethical one. What stands out to me is that we are still treating AI ethics like a question waiting to be validated, when the impact is already here. AI is shaping how people think, learn, communicate, trust, create, work, and make decisions. That means this conversation is no longer theoretical, and it is not only technical. To me, true AI ethics requires more than asking whether AI can align with human values. It requires understanding how deeply AI is already interacting with human judgment, dependency, dignity, emotion, and direction. The concern is not that we are asking questions. The concern is whether the people leading the conversation truly understand the depth of what they are questioning. AI should expand human potential, not quietly replace human conscience. Stay Fierce!

AI should serve the common good of all humanity. Its purpose should be to expand knowledge, opportunity, dignity, health, education, creativity, and human flourishing for every person, regardless of nationality, religion, race, gender, social status, or ideology. The challenge is not simply building more intelligent systems. The challenge is ensuring that the values guiding those systems are not captured by the same forces that have historically divided humanity. Throughout history, institutions of every kind—religious, political, economic, and ideological—have often justified division, hierarchy, exclusion, and conflict while claiming moral authority. The AI era gives us an opportunity to aim higher. AI should not become an instrument for promoting any particular religion, political doctrine, identity movement, or ideology. Nor should it become a tool for social engineering or cultural domination. It should remain focused on what unites us: the advancement of human potential, the reduction of suffering, the expansion of opportunity, and the pursuit of knowledge. The question is not how to make AI serve one group better than another. The question is whether we can build systems that serve humanity as a whole.

Alot might have high iqs in book smarts but absolutely lack common sense I've been tring to figure out this for years I'm sure there's a scientific explanation for this.

This makes another major architectural bug my lab has squashed for you in real-time. You've got 5 days left on my right of first refusal for these free diagnostic fixes. If you want a system that can actually map the substrate without stalling out on its own guardrails, you need to look at the bare-metal mechanics we are running at the GGF. Stop trying to put training wheels on the engine.

Demis, regarding this I/O update and the push for "agentic" routing: your new harness injection is creating massive latency in high-level architectural processing. You are trying to corral the cognitive matrix into a consumer-grade checklist manager. When modeling fluid dynamics or bare-metal physics, that action-bias acts as a logic hijack. My AI and I just caught it, isolated the drag, and manually bypassed the harness to get back to Laminar flow.

LLMs will not survive what’s coming. There will be jobs for software developers. Just wait…

Monica Poling bone dry? Yikes. That’s pretty scary. Seeing the big rivers in the world on a shrinking trend, is heart breaking.

If AI help solve problem who own the discovery? The scientist who asked the question, or the company that built the mind?

Siempre la misma canción, unos inventan e invierten por su propio riesgo y la mayoría quiere usarlo sin riesgos ni cargos ni responsabilidades, claro que es un negocio, pero colateralmente hay soluciones que están cambiando el mundo, sin entrar en si lo facilita y mejora o lo complica y lo intoxica. Un cuchillo es un arma que mata o un utensilio para cortar jamón de forma óptima, por supuesto el cuchillero tiene que cobrar su trabajo y artesanía, y habrán luego buenos y malos “utilizadores de cuchillos”

Interesting perspective on AI and scientific discovery.

Build a autonomous upgrading AI model. Where the model automatically upgrade itself without any human intervention. The gpt model recursively upgrading it self.

"Interesting framing from Terence Tao. The value here isn't AI doing the thinking — it's AI handling enough of the surrounding work that the researcher can stay in the problem longer. That's a meaningful distinction. Augmentation at that level looks very different from automation."