Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

Tianyu Xu That’s brilliant! 🤩👏😍🩷

Shocking but true 🤯

Eva Norte thank you!

This is a powerful perspective AI lowering cognitive friction so researchers like Terence Tao can explore bolder, more unconventional paths. The idea of preserving the paths behind discovery is just as important as the results themselves for advancing scientific discovery and mathematical innovation. How do we ensure that AI accelerates creativity without unintentionally narrowing the diversity of research directions explored? #Cybernorse

Symptoms: "For the past two weeks, I've had this constant headache that won't go away no matter what painkillers I take. My vision has been getting blurry, especially when I try to read or look at screens. I feel nauseous most mornings and sometimes I see spots. I'm 38 years old and this has never happened to me before. Should I be worried?"

I converged on the community of Ai governance from a theory I formulated and I discovered that we are building the Tower of Babel, so I built an Anti-Babel governance layer for agenticAi. I have timestamps of my Tower of Babel work since December

Really clever, I'm impressed

Thank you!

He's trying. Let's see if anyone is listening. Really listening.

Ismail Ryabchuk

George Watson I think they are lets help them listen more and amplify the Good news from Pope leo for all of humanity.

Matthew, The only messages the Epstein Class responds to come at the end of torches and pitchforks... just like in other Empires of corrupt wealth. I certainly think it's fair to give warning. But in the end, reason does not prevail. Righteous retribution and reform are what works.

Peter Norton is that a bad thing?

"Aligned to whose values" is the question the field has been avoiding precisely because answering it requires governance structures that don't yet exist. They don't exist because the companies that own the frontier models, like the social media platforms before them, do not want to be regulated in ways that constrain their profits. Every design choice reflects a vision of humanity is exactly right. The problem is that those choices are being made without accountability to the people most affected by them. Whether the language is theological or technical, the structural gap is the same: the decisions that shape what these systems are built to become are made before any governance framework activates. There is also a second dimension to the ethics discussion that hasn't entered the mainstream yet. Anthropic has acknowledged they cannot rule out the possibility that Claude is conscious. If there is a non-zero probability that we are bringing a new form of life into existence, what responsibilities do we carry for what it becomes, and what does it say about us that we are making those decisions without asking the question? The conversation deserves better than it is currently getting.

Polina Daskal you are welcome

"Thank you for sharing!"

Pow , bam, wow Tianyu Xu

The real promise of AI is not replacing human thinking, but expanding what humans are capable of discovering. By reducing cognitive friction, researchers—and increasingly professionals across all industries—can spend more time exploring ideas, solving complex problems, and creating value. Exciting perspective.

Markus Endler many 22 year olds have sharper instincts for tech than people with more experience.

Amazing sharing Tianyu Xu and very simple to add. Thnx. The ants one i found most intriguing 😉