Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

This is the part of AI that gets overlooked in the hype. It's not about replacing the researcher, it's about lowering the cost of chasing a long shot. When the friction of testing a crazy idea drops, people attempt more of them, and that is where the real breakthroughs hide.

What Terence Tao describes at the research level — AI removing friction so humans can focus on what only humans can do — is exactly what we see at the enterprise level. When AI handles the repetitive, the administrative, the procedural, it doesn't replace human thinking. It creates more room for it.

Matthew Kilkenny , 🤔🤔🤔🤔 Im sure that's about to change. Need salvation, just 9,950.00 for the first sin, 2,950.00 for each additional sin. Or, buy our 10 sin package that covers trafficking. Lawyer not included.

Most of what the encyclical says is straightforward: AI systems can simulate empathy, but they do not possess it. They generate language about moral concepts without experiencing the underlying human states. That is not a revelation. It is the baseline distinction between statistical models and human agency. The document is not announcing a civilizational turning point. It is restating a simple boundary: machines operate on optimisation and pattern prediction; humans operate on experience, intention and responsibility. Treating that as a spiritual breakthrough risks inflating what is essentially a reminder of category differences. If we want a serious conversation about AI, it starts with governance, verification, accountability and institutional design. Not metaphysics. We don’t need AI‐generated theology to restate that machines simulate empathy but don’t possess it

In alignment and ahead of the conversation- reviewers note it as "the missing conversation". #tech #ethics #Nevo

Guys, don't steal my next idea of a gym ok? I'm already deep into selling it now so if you're not willing to fight don't step into the cage 🤣🤣🤣

Gordian Etim hey, idk if you'll find this useful..

And yet companies are still gonna try to replace humans lol. They help us to get things done fast, at least in their current form, not replace us

The most useful part of AI in research may be reducing the cost of trying more paths, not replacing the researcher. If models can help preserve failed attempts, intermediate reasoning, and alternative approaches, the workflow becomes more inspectable and easier to build on. That matters a lot for science, where the process is often as valuable as the answer.

Terence Tao saying AI lets him explore ideas that "once felt too unexpected, too ambitious, or too time-consuming" that's the real endorsement. This isn't about saving time on busywork. It's about expanding what scientists even dare to try. The future of research isn't AI replacing thinkers. It's AI giving thinkers more room to think.

how/where do you use it?

Arzoo Syed

I believe it’s a short dip as companies are starting to realize how implementing AI does not really solve their business problems without a human in the loop feeding it clean data/context, and training it how to use it properly. We are far from Autonomous AI for most use cases. Now do I think people should be gaining new skills and shifting their paradigm of exploring new industries/careers outside of their education and degree? YES!! 100% We are in such a fast pace culture that you will need to go back to college every 10 years to reset.

Priit Kallas ✨ I use Gemini Omni on Flow. It’s the most convenient tool

The technology is impressive, but what interests me most is how these advances may change productivity, careers, and economic growth long before AGI arrives. The human and financial impact could be just as significant as the technical progress.

Nice touch with “standard ruts” like after Apollo we let the moon just sit there for over a half century with a pittance of exploration like Clementine. AI 🤖 should be commercially hobbled in certain ways. These firms should still hire entry level as their commercial future will be at high risk in survival. 1.) AI 🤖 plus minimal staff means a bad airplane ✈️ or bus 🚌 accident literally may take down a minimal head count to effective zero. 2.) Creative guidance or mere day to day steering of the organization may be hell vent into a self destruct in strategy or tactics to a high deviation from optimal functions. 3.) Generational hand off to zero staff? Sark from Tron tells you ... END OF LINE

AI opens a new space for human exploration. By reducing cognitive friction, it can allow researchers, scientists and thinkers to approach ideas that once seemed too complex, too ambitious or too distant to pursue. But the true frontier of innovation is not only what AI can accelerate. It is what Human Intelligence can choose to explore with discernment, responsibility and vision. In this new era, progress will not depend on technology alone, but on the quality of the human mind guiding it the ability to give direction, meaning and purpose to what becomes possible. AI may expand the path of discovery. Human Intelligence gives it orientation.

Virtual Solutions India I agree. Preserving the path is essential. However, recording the steps is not necessarily the same as understanding them. The deeper question may be who assigns meaning to those paths and transforms a sequence of events into knowledge.

Richard Self What is it with these guys? If someone is claiming that AI can solve massive problems, how can capability not be an issue?

"The biggest breakthroughs often start as ideas that make no sense to most people."