Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

Matthew Kilkenny ✨🙌💫🦅🔥 Amen lndeed enjoy your every moment in Shanghai ☺️

Keryann Granet It is here to stay, but with this technology. Are we leaving a better planet for our children with more freedom, more safety, more opportunity, more stability, better climate, fairer system, etc? Or is it more control, less safety, less opportunities, more disruption, etcUltimately it this simple: Who are the AI companies in service to:a) The shareholders?b) Wellbeing of humanity?The answer is glaringly obvious, and what does people in category A want? A hint: More for themselves, and less for you, me and everyone else.

It is always, and always will be a human nature issue. How can it be anything else. Some people just do not know when enough is enough and no matter what they have, it's still not enough. Always chasing --> never arriving.Ultimately it this simple: Who are the AI companies in service to:a) The shareholders?b) Wellbeing of humanity?A hint: In one of the answers there are a small group of people who desire nothing else than more for themselves, and less for you, me and everyone else.

I see the "who wins" argument behind it, but since the solution is not to ban the use of AI, then understanding the strings behind and the fuel that move it this revolutionis a good first step: energy, data, computing power, knowledge... since OWNING our data and our digital twins, will enable every single person to gain part of that power back.

I'm intrigued by your insights here. What inspired you to explore this perspective?

love the way in which this - without even mentioning it - acknowledges that AI is so much more than just generating images and videos

Thanks for shining light on this social media phenomenon of posting opinion,analysis, summary etc for everything at lightning speed. I understand the algorithm rewards jumping on virality bandwagon but some stories like this needs stepping away from the noise, reading, re reading and weigh both side of the debate carefully.

Matthew Kilkenny Appreciate that Matthew. A large part of the pressure now comes from the fact that execution capability is scaling faster than authority clarity. Many systems can now act, coordinate, optimise and adapt operationally. But when conditions change mid-execution, organisations still struggle to answer a very simple question: who currently holds legitimate decision authority? That becomes increasingly important once AI moves from assisting workflows… to participating inside operational infrastructure itself.

Architects also have a role here that often gets skipped. Every governance decision we make at the platform layer quietly answers the question of who benefits. Default model choice, who owns the data plane, where logs live, who can call which tool. These are not neutral defaults. They are policy. If we keep treating them as engineering trivia, the structural outcomes you describe become a side effect of pull requests nobody reviewed carefully.

But eventually it will also provide the output which will be ofcourse much more better than human efforts 👌, that too without supervision 😄

Al isn't the problem The people making headcount decisions based on hype and zero execution track record those are the gamblers

Matthew Kilkenny, The real issue is why do we accept that Big Tech companies define hardcoded my moral compass and of all of their users worldwide with genAI and on their online platforms inside their AI-models and platforms? #moderation #productivity #creativity #culturalbias #democracymatters

Love this breakdown. So many people think EQ means being soft or agreeable, when really, it’s about being self-aware enough to know when to speak up and when to listen. That “calming presence” piece is underrated. One person in a meeting who doesn’t panic when things go sideways can change the whole energy in the room. Also, “being happy for others when they do well” that one separates real high performers from the insecure ones. Jealousy is such a giveaway of low EQ. Thanks for putting this together. Saving this.

Exactly.AI is not just scaling intelligence — it is scaling power, decisions, and economic control. That is why the real conversation is no longer about what AI can do, but who gets to decide where the value flows.

Greg Manto Fair point, the pipeline connects. If the big players only build enterprise tools, the baker never sees somethinhg worth adopting. But waiting for that system to fix itself is a losing game. The baker can't lobby openai. He can learn to use what's on his counter. Both matter. But one of them he can start tomorrow morning before the oven's warm.

Pascal BORNET The real inflection point is governance of AI driven value distribution. Technical progress is outpacing institutional frameworks for accountability, transparency, and equitable benefit allocation.

What a poor view of the future and of the way private economy works… the most important role for public powers will be to make sure competition exists.. the market will do the rest.. the BiG risk is to loose control of AI, because there is a race between democracies and autocracies .. and if democracies loose that race, the world can become hell‼️

Great 👍

Sophia B. The why is those who never believed God is king.

Critical thinking. As a child, I was told in the Catholic Church that the eye in the center of the dome was the eye of God — it watches you everywhere. In that sense, I find myself wondering what goals a US pope has who cooperates with Anthropic and other tech giants. The former pope had a connection with Epstein. „Anthropic has engaged with the Vatican in ethical considerations for AI, even listing three Catholic thinkers, including Bishop Paul Tighe, secretary of the Dicastery for Culture and Education, among the contributors of its Claude Constitution which guides the company's flagship large language model.“