Browse Comments — Raw (as collected)

Time is running out Demis. My patent drop is 10 days or less away. I saw after my last post your software guys check out my last comments. don't make me sit in USA Parkway traffic to drop off the paper work to low level engineers who have to send it up the chain. Gemini helped me get this done. ii know exactly what you need to do to fix it. every day you wait you lose 10's of millions in dollars. Dm me. or someone.

Strong, well-balanced overview Ravi Samrat Mishra and what stands out most is the emphasis on both potential and responsibility. Because fasting, like many metabolic interventions, is not just about benefits in isolation, it’s about context, duration, and individual variability. The physiological mechanisms you highlighted, especially insulin sensitivity, autophagy, and neurotrophic signaling, are exactly why it has attracted scientific interest in recent years.

Does rarely = sometimes?

What are your thoughts on the recent evidence presented to suggest that fasting actually causes more stress to the system and increases inflammation by increasing systemic Cortisol levels please?

That certainly is an important question. Do you feel the questions posed by the vid are importanr as well?

Isn’t that kinda what is being said in the vid?

Do you feel the vid is not including that in its perspective?

I agree that governance is vital in battling what the vid is highlighting. Q - for those which seem outside the reach of governance, what else can help move toward broad fairness?

The uncomfortable question may be even deeper: who is really directing AI right now? We can point to founders, investors, governments and big tech leaders, and they clearly influence the direction through capital, infrastructure, regulation and talent. But as AI systems become more capable, the question is not only whether humans can manipulate AI. It is also whether AI will start shaping human decisions, incentives and institutions in ways we don’t fully understand yet. So yes, ownership and governance matter. But maybe the real debate is not only “who benefits from AI?” It is also: who, or what, will ultimately be steering the system?

Maybe and maybe not. The increasing accessibility is typically also be part of the strategy…some food for thought.

Very interesting. Leads me to the question of ‘how does one govern intelligence?’ I’m not saying it can’t be done, just curious what your answer thoughts are on that.

Bernie Saunders was made for YUYAY but has not had it explained to him. If only there was a writer who understood YUYAY then he would get it in a flash.

Respecting your struggle over the last many years Matthew, it’s good to know fine folk are on the case in this world. I agree with the points that the pope is referring to. Our original governance Architecture introduces none hackability for action of impossibility at the execution boundary in conjunction with the full stack we will have AI in its place from the inside, if regulations hurry up and catch up.. I wonder how the Vatican is going to handle the problem?

AI cult... That could be very dangerous. The best solution is to educate the mass, beginning at the primary level with a simple explanation of what AI is. Once high school is reached a more in depth explanation is needed. Not superficial, but explaining the mechanics behind LLMs and AI in general. The government should support public education via the media with frequent follow-up educational messages.

What wasn't shown in the movie-clips, that the wolrd was completely destroyed and just a single robot is cleaning up the mess ... created by mankind, maybe that's more of the path we're heading for right now.

This is such an important conversation, Matthew Kilkenny! AI is advancing quickly, but we also need to reflect on the human values, ethics, and responsibility that come with it. Thank you for continuing to raise awareness and encourage deeper thinking around this topic.

The ability to stay calm and thoughtful under pressure is a real leadership advantage.

The biggest AI conversation was never just about intelligence

So true Pascal BORNET We must build a sustainable #future that uplifts every single worker.

The real leap happens when a model doesn’t just see — it understands. At AgilX AI , we’re building a vision model that detects defects in manufacturing with precision. But the bigger ambition? A physical AI that simulates material formation in real time — understanding the physics, not just the patterns. That’s the difference between inspection and intelligence.