Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

Posted over two years ago lets hope the EU AI ACT has imbedded the values of Pope Leo?

The AI debate keeps getting stuck at the surface level: “good or bad” “ethical or dangerous” “tool or threat” Meanwhile, the real issue keeps shifting underneath in real time. The hardest governance problem may not be whether AI can think. It may be whether humans can keep up with reality as increasingly powerful systems keep running. Most people treat governance as rules written before deployment. But real-world conditions constantly change: * incentives shift * contexts evolve * legitimacy weakens * operators drift A system can still look stable and trustworthy while operating under outdated assumptions nobody is reevaluating anymore. That’s why calibration, contextual grounding, and runtime revalidation matter more than most people think. AI doesn’t only become dangerous when it breaks. It can become dangerous while functioning perfectly under outdated ideas of legitimacy. The future governance problem may not be: “How do we stop AI?” It may be: “How do humans stay connected to reality while machine execution keeps accelerating around them?”

We are all called to this in the AI super cycle posted over 2 yrs ago now :

Look at how the most powerful in Silicon Valley want to use ‘Political-theology’’ to win the day : they knew the Pope would enter the debate on a global scale and he would not need social media to get his message out to Billions. The Irony of it : now the very machine that tries to silence objective TRUTH has mistakenly made it go viral even if it tries to derail that Algo!

Real power and in

Leo Michaels why would you say this more important post got far less interest than the post That announced Rarum Novarum? Take a look at the starts this is an important question!

Leo Michaels I meant that announced the encyclical?

Will take a look Matthew, GL on your endeavours!

We are living in anthropological folly

The think–build–check loop is a simple but powerful way to describe what good development already looks like, just faster with better tools.

The frustration many people feel with AI coding often comes from skipping the same steps that make traditional software reliable in the first place.

What stands out is the emphasis on ownership, AI can accelerate execution, but the responsibility for architecture and quality still sits with the human.

Yup, incredible how many people “read” the encyclical just to vomit the same and shallow takes on social media. I decided that I will not talk about it until I’ve read it and meditated it all.

Very sad state for sure. Something awry. I can understand why the company would want to whitewash their platform but Abrahamic Monotheism is a relatively new phenomena and does not speak for majority of the world view - and certainly not for those who cannot speak for themselves: animals, birds, rivers, forests. Satya AI does. i-satya.com Endorsed by humans.

I’m not Catholic and I haven’t read the entire encyclical, but I agree with everthing I’ve heard reported. I’m all about leaning into AI, but we need to maintain strong ethical boundaries on its use.

The Day 1 advice to "Do one real work task" is the most important part. A tutorial shows what is possible. A real task shows what is practical and where you need to provide better context to get a useful result.

TCOY Wellness fasting 👍🏻👍🏻✅

Greed, power & ... If I don’t do it, he will So, the fear of losing to the next competitor

Plz send it to tpo@dypiemr@ac.in

Raymond Mattern care to elaborate ?