Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

Gerald Chikukwa, PhD agredd, excellent well informed comment. Thank you for adding value and elevating the discussion.

Buillding is good. Building faster is better. Building faster someting nobody want is a waste of time and energy. Doing the same thing again and again is worse. But it is the reality of most of the companies and people.

The humor aside, there is a real insight here. The relationship between humans and AI is going to look nothing like what most people predict. The businesses that figure out the right balance between automation and human judgment early are going to have a massive advantage over the ones still debating whether to adopt it at all.

I haven't read the document, but loved your post. I spotted more than a few comments that showed signs of being entirely AI, and, as the AI loves stating, "the irony was not lost on me"

Leonard Rodman, M.Sc. PMP LSSBB CSM CSPO Workato The strongest outcomes usually come from continuous refinement rather than one perfect intervention, because progress compounds through feedback loops, small adjustments, and disciplined attention to detail over time.

In my view, the real question is: what has @BernieSanders actually done for humanity, and who does he truly care about besides himself?

Matthew Kilkenny, I'm painfully aware of the current political scenario. I'm merely thinking about the future.

The AI revolution is a psychological revolution. That’s how I’ve been describing it. Why? Because even though you didn’t mention the word psychology once in your post, every one of the fields you mentioned is piped through the brain. The only way we have to know anything is through sensation and perception, and that includes philosophy and religion, all knowledge and experience is piped through the sensory organs and processed by the brain, where it is integrated into a semblance of reality, not reality itself.

My original post got enormous interest 100s of likes and more than 40 reposts and yet this post got 30 likes and 2 reposts: surely what the Pope said in the encyclical is far more important than the post that mentioned it's arrival? Given what the Pope had to say about how public opinion is being shaped, can you think why this is the case on #linkedin? These are the hard conversations we all must have if we are to have objective truth and transparency in the AI supercycle. Do you agree or disagree my friends. Lonica Smith Saeed Al Dhaheri Srini Pagidyala Dan Blake Mo Gawdat Peter H. Diamandis (PHD Ventures) Paolo Benanti Christopher Wright Wasfi Safadi Dion Wiggins Leo Michaels Angelique Letizia Rachel Beck Rebecca Human AI Trust Leader Jeffrey Vahanian, CFP® Julie Saslow Schroeder

It is going to take a long time before hiring managers figure this out and they cannot be told this. They just assume you are full of it or are stubbornly clinging to relevance as a developer. Most developers will drop out some of us can just take a year or two vacation keeping resume/CV active and just travel the world a bit in th3 mean time while the industry learns to take their heads out of their rectal cavities.

Kate St. Michel, this reminded me of a great discussion we had the other day.

Matthew Kilkenny See stats below my friends!

Thnx for sharing your thoughts on this since that in itself moves the broader discussion forward in the light. It feels important that this encyclical now exists, even if many of us have not yet fully read or absorbed it, because it gives names, framing, language, and baseline positions to AI as seen through a specific lens...Christian in this case. Not because everyone must agree with that lens, rather because civilization-scale transitions benefit when major perspectives articulate how they see the moment, the risks, the responsibilities, and the opportunities ahead. Hopefully this also encourages other lenses to emerge with similar rigor, courage, thoughtfulness, and clarity from their own foundations and traditions, and helps widen the collective conversation rather than narrow it. Not necessarily toward full philosophical merger, history suggests that is unlikely, still even partial convergence matters enormously because civilizations rarely collapse from lack of intelligence, more often they fracture from failure to coordinate wisdom across difference. 🪞

Eugene E. Kim Good I am glad you are thinking of the future most souls are sleep walking into it?

Many people know how to make clever points, but not everyone has the opportunity to "advertise" them. What solution do the Pope and Olah propose? To make AI Catholic?! Will #BinSalman agree to use Catholic AI to govern his Kingdom?! We propose the #SystemOfConsciousness as a Parallel Symbolic-Cognitive Core — a universal framework designed to enhance the ethical, cultural, and contextual capabilities of next-generation artificial intelligence. The deeper challenge may be that concepts such as dignity, truth, justice, and peace are not interpreted identically across cultures, legal systems, and philosophical traditions. As AI systems become global, governance may increasingly require architectures capable not only of defining values, but also of preserving coherence across diverse interpretations of those values.

The vending machine framing is the right diagnosis. The failure mode isn't the first prompt being wrong, it's not catching the moment the model went sideways three steps later. Reviewing as you go is the expensive skill, not the prompt. Building snapfast.ai exactly this way. Fast builder next to me, but I'm still the architect, the reviewer, and the one on the hook when production breaks.

Ekadashi ki Jay!

Pope Leo mentions the global nuclear agreement and what is needed now. Posted 6 months ago for mission Genesis ( See how Theology is being evoked ) my original post was two yrs ago:

The Pope spoke of the concentration of power into the hands of the few. Posted weeks before the USA elections: We now see Elon Join forces with Anthropic maybe he knew Dario’s biz partner was going to be a speaker at the Vatican on Monday?

Felipe Witchger to your last post