Browse Comments — Clean (de-noised)

Jay G. Great point. Which area do you think EQ impacts the most at work today?

Scott Capelin The leaders people trust most are often the ones who bring calm and safety into difficult situations. Thanks for sharing.

Clara Hawking- " But more importantly, it frames schools not merely as places of skill training or workforce preparation, but as central moral institutions responsible for helping society remain human in the digital era." - In final analysis, the genAI problem is a School problem, because higher learning schools are ones which pioneered &further developed genAI, along w. continuing partnership w. industry. Schools have not only played it both ways but ALL WAYS. And from young Marvin Minski at MIT (1960) to elder Marvin Minski (2008) w. patronage of J. Epstein. We have also seen this problem w. schools when they were pushing finance &"get rich quick with finance careers" which created the spirit ending in 2008 crisis in larger economy. 3 MIT economists are said to have been at heart of financial instruments that plummeted the system. Schools been pushing idea among the Youth that life is about innovation &materialism, and nothing else. Their most important objective not social welfare but endowment. This is all final result of secularism, which has completely ousted humanism in today’s world, having been central to educational system. Whether Pope Leo &encyclicals can change this situation for a better world should be everybody’s hope.

Mariia Sazonova Such a good point. Listening without fixing takes real discipline.

this is so binary. meaning is the invariant. it does not matter how you get to ethics and morals. once you have them you are welcome in the room. Others are not welcome! Do not be the person that promotes groups of others ,unless that group has no morals and ethics. That's the invariant not the path...

Mark Igbinedion Teams become more open and resilient when leaders admit mistakes instead of hiding them. Thanks for sharing.

I’m not sure you know what miraculous actually means.

The long-term winners in AI may not be the companies using the most AI, but the ones applying it selectively where the economics genuinely make sense.

Jeremy Springfield while agree with you, you must remember the past (before Trump), the Boeing debacle of the Max jet (and Other Boeing issues). The FAA needs MORE funding, not less to work as intended.

The "must be able to code" requirement often signals that the hiring manager is not fully clear on what a PM is actually supposed to do. Technical credibility with an engineering team comes from asking sharp questions, understanding trade-offs, respecting complexity, and making decisions with clear reasoning, not from being able to write the code yourself. The risk you flag at the end is the real one: a PM who gravitates toward the technical layer because it feels concrete and measurable will naturally drift away from customers, market signals, and the messy human problems that actually determine whether a product succeeds or fails. The best PMs are not the most technical people in the room, they are the ones who can translate between customer reality and engineering constraints without losing either side in the process.

Clara Hawking - I have been discussing these issues since 2017, with these ideas crystallizing here: GENERATIVE AI THREATS TO A CIVILIZATION Best.

This is awesome! It's one thing to learn about emotional intelligence. It's another to put it into practice.

Cynthia Johnson I admit. I was a bit tounge in cheek there. 😊

Good breakdown—AI terminology is expanding quickly, and clarity like this really helps in keeping the ecosystem understandable.

Good point. Many AI discussions still focus on capability while ignoring the concentration of power, decision-making, and economic leverage.

I've watched some of the smartest people turn into their own bottlenecks. EQ offers discernment that IQ often overthinks. Self-awareness is priceless.

Paolo Spada Good ideas. I woukd be happy for Masters to be closed book.

Sunn k bahut sukun mila bhai 😬😃

Mr. Huang is the guy who is mainly responsible for it to become so costly....

I don’t find it unrealistic that some people responded quickly. There is a real audience of people who eagerly wait for encyclicals, Supreme Court opinions, and other major institutional texts, then read them as soon as they come out because they are major intellectual events, IMHO. There are few modern day publications that distill and deal so deeply and seriously with philosophy (if you consider the law to be applied philosophy) and real world topics like these do. Neither limit the length of what they're saying to appeal to editors or audiences with limited attention spans and they are grounded in evidence and citations, parsing topics at a level few other organizations consistently match. Whether they're skimming it, reading it, or just glancing at it, at least they're paying attention to it.