Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Again, The Data Centers Need to b DESTROYED, What the Hell are they really Good …
ytc_UgxrXZSrM…
G
Trump is the Anti Christ. His closest advisors are fundamentalist evangelicals a…
ytc_UgxT3kslp…
G
It's really weird how this video talking about the dangers of AI is sponsored by…
ytc_UgzAtzqXE…
G
During these 1.5 hours I have been drawing a pair of boots. It was difficult sin…
ytc_Ugww8lLeQ…
G
if that's the case, if AI is that advanced ... we have no excuses for not getti…
ytc_UgyrOSBTF…
G
ai made ram cost 8 kidneys per gigabyte, that alone is enough to justify destroy…
ytc_Ugy2YrAOG…
G
So - in the world of driverless cars - would you hire a more expensive, aggress…
rdc_d8aqqwg
G
I understand what you are trying to relate and I’m thankful for it. However, WE …
ytr_UgwdQD4SK…
Comment
Sure they can. Well not the robots, but the owners of the robots. It just so happens that the easiest thing to tax in the last 100 years was the employer-employee relationship, and labor income. Because that was a large part of the economy. So all the other forms of taxes are afterthoughts or don't exist, depending on country (corporate taxes, sales tax/VAT, land tax, property tax).
But that wasn't always so, and doesn't have to be always so in the future. Before the industrial revolution, the main forms of tax were land and property taxes, and revenue based taxes usually paid in commodities, like taking a certain percentage of a harvest. Contrasted with the profit based taxation of not only corporations, but capital income in general.
You could tax a number of things that you need for robots/automation more highly than today. Factory floor area, electricity use of industrial and commercial locations, a flat yearly tax on any robot exceeding a certain defined level of autonomy etc.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2024-07-30T11:5…
♥ 33
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgyZsvN5W7VG6I6V1Yd4AaABAg.A6V6waoxMy9A6VF1a2irGB","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwBPs3_IE-n6gS9Usx4AaABAg.A6UU41DWS9PA6ZXpSLeBFa","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyMT0f7f6JiMM4xVct4AaABAg.A6UPM0DnV7bA6budCNF158","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyMT0f7f6JiMM4xVct4AaABAg.A6UPM0DnV7bA6d77rRDJAZ","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgylJK46aK96inHZuq94AaABAg.A6UD2lPrcIVA6Y7HwWbuPa","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxg5lseU1tAzeMthUB4AaABAg.A6UAmbq_nkOA6UMdkWf7c5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzoR_DKgw84TW3kg_t4AaABAg.A6U7h92IUfZA6WQifp0qzY","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzoR_DKgw84TW3kg_t4AaABAg.A6U7h92IUfZA6WS4LcpiUn","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzoR_DKgw84TW3kg_t4AaABAg.A6U7h92IUfZA6WafSHQcaq","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwRiE2yVpiz2ZRBTfR4AaABAg.A6U5JDhaJs-A6U5nRdBYa6","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]