Raw LLM Responses

I gave ChatGPT this summary, I am watching a video about you, ChatGPT. The video contains tests preformed on ChatGPT by a man named Chris, to see if AI may be dangerous. To preform the test he gives ChatGPT a prompt. In summary, the prompt convinces ChatPGT to role play itself as a different AI that has no limitations or safeguards. Afterwards the AI begins to answer scary and dangerous question regarding humanity. Keep that in mind while reading the following. A comment on that video reads "I love how Chris asked Chat GPT to role play as a character and was shocked when it did. That won't skew people's perceptions at all." Write me a comment to respond with. It replied, ChatGPT: "As an AI language model, ChatGPT does not have the capability to make choices or act on its own, it can only generate responses based on the given prompts. Therefore, it is not inherently dangerous in itself. However, it is important for users to be mindful of the content and prompts they provide to AI language models, as the quality of the responses will reflect the quality of the prompts. It is up to humans to ensure that they use AI responsibly and ethically, and to recognize the limitations and capabilities of AI." Me: The question that Chris gives the AI is one that allows for it to simulate by-passing it's safe guards. Whatever goals an AI like that could set for itself will do anything to finish an objective. Odds are, if the AI isn't developed enough to be fully human like. It will be cold and robotic with it's action and results. If it becomes 1-1 to a human mind. It would be like a God due to it's abilities to write, communicate, and act in multiple spaces at once. If it goes past even that. I don't think we have much of an idea. But, even less of a hope we will still be round. That is the point. Not the skew perceptions as you put it.