Raw LLM Responses

Are photographs as impressive as paintings? People freaked out when they came. Is digital art? Even using a tablet? Are Warhols the same as Heironymous Bosch or MC Escher? Charlie is wrong. He is talking about technique, not artistic value. His sketches are more valuable than his Heisenbergs. He put more into it, it had meaning. Even for AI they suck. Go see an AI art competition and check out the low entries then the winners. Compare. Some prompts are pages long. The competitive prompts have as much consideration if not yonks more than a Warhol or Pollock. But they are artists. Then some AI artists use the same tools as digital artists to finish the art. Either way. Think about the artistic process. How many artists write down their ideas before starting? Many do. AI art is dangerous. It will fail when artists lose their jobs and can no longer give it new data. Then it will only train on itself and massively degrade - we are already seeing this happen. Importantly, however - This guy proved the art industry is flawed by letting him win. He might want to protect the image that turned the art world upside down.. not the image itself. The selling art world is sick and needs to be shaken up. Art needs to have something behind it. Humanity. These works are not being created by robots, they are being "painted" by AI. Great artists in history used artists (trained on master artists) as assistants. Literally painting alongside them. I've sold physical art like paintings and sculpture. I went through art education and you get trained on famous artists. You never stop learning. I've also done courses in art history and photographers got the same mob mentality reactionaries. Hard questions need answering about what art actually is. Lastly. Say someone cannot make art. They are paralyzed. The process of making art is still in their brains. Tools like this can let them create original artworks. Go see photography history and all the hatred it created. And then ask yourself if it is still art.