Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I just started on AI coding, and I can say it is the greatest time to be a softw…
ytc_UgzuSWKOR…
G
As someone who's work with technology his whole life, this not only will take jo…
ytc_UgylD_PYc…
G
To me, the Chinese room thought experiment just describes a chatbot. You can ver…
ytc_Ughk5LigT…
G
I'm not a computer guy, so I like your simple explanation of how AI thinks. Plea…
ytc_UgyG_VhUu…
G
This was my thought as well - AI is going to end up being this huge self help pr…
rdc_lzf0v8i
G
I actually think it's intentional. I find that when I want my writing to seem mo…
ytr_Ugz5dRnoN…
G
How to tell if is ai or not
1st image: It’s ai because of them soulless eyes. S…
ytc_UgyEJ4ad-…
G
Had no idea how much Ai is scattered everywhere all ready in such a short space …
ytc_UgzeXkZE5…
Comment
Google should up to people doing seaches, whatever that user is searching for. What they're doing with machine learning is trying to take a guess at what a user means when they something as unspecific as such as "shoe". Right now, their algorithm runs the risk of being too narrow, due to the biases. Google want to overcome this.
No. It is not at all sexist to provide people with different results based on their gender. It's a little naive, a little basic. Ideally, we would want to serve users different results based on differences in what they are actually looking for. Gender can be an indicator of this, but Google pretty clearly want to move on the more precise and robust indicators. Gender is good, but still very rough.
youtube
AI Bias
2017-08-26T10:3…
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxFSBR1fccZhUpAPLh4AaABAg.8X9YdotL2FD8X9brX1a_pZ","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy-xgV3WeXI8GRR5vZ4AaABAg.8X21IpT6-T_8X9_FHKU0Wq","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxUF0NgMk2XbjcOTLN4AaABAg.8Wlq_p0UDWX8WmNsKZjJwD","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzS0d_hiYY-las7zxB4AaABAg.8WibpzKM9lB8WihZ9c43b-","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzS0d_hiYY-las7zxB4AaABAg.8WibpzKM9lB8WiklrXRHzH","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxf3nZXVD3q_XEXGnh4AaABAg.8WiH55mNZN28WiiEw8UlFZ","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyEXtana9HUXy5iB0R4AaABAg.8WhLaHiOkMs8Wkuy5ihcl1","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmIGscl53btE5R0OV4AaABAg.8Wguh4FSIdR8Wh1e0OcJbC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwh23tsbFv5YB11ioB4AaABAg.8WguBmEHjPL8WgxkxpVR-v","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwpEMUhCSHwQdFCei94AaABAg.AGE5EZ_NLwAAKcj6IBrKmO","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]