Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
That school is racist!! Public education and sitting in a desk is the only way t…
ytc_UgwIAg1yC…
G
Tough topic but I love how you've addressed it. AI threatening our careers is a …
ytc_UgxQMsNRS…
G
A.I. FOUNDATION IS A FALSE GOD AND A RELIGION SO I SAY NO BECAUSE I WORSHIP THE …
ytc_UgyK2Qnv5…
G
ai cant possibly be 100% especially when many people look the same even as cousi…
ytc_UgxvI24Mq…
G
Art is so much more than some “talent” to flex on others. Art is a language ANYO…
ytc_Ugzu9RDu9…
G
At a mass level ai won't replace call center jobs because at some level someone …
ytc_UgwINgZyK…
G
also are you really making a reply to a video that is like almost two years old …
ytr_Ugxo8_jwu…
G
Shadiversity's argument for why the AI art he generates is also his (he photosho…
ytc_UgzV9dDYD…
Comment
Google should up to people doing seaches, whatever that user is searching for. What they're doing with machine learning is trying to take a guess at what a user means when they something as unspecific as such as "shoe". Right now, their algorithm runs the risk of being too narrow, due to the biases. Google want to overcome this.
No. It is not at all sexist to provide people with different results based on their gender. It's a little naive, a little basic. Ideally, we would want to serve users different results based on differences in what they are actually looking for. Gender can be an indicator of this, but Google pretty clearly want to move on the more precise and robust indicators. Gender is good, but still very rough.
youtube
AI Bias
2017-08-26T10:3…
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxFSBR1fccZhUpAPLh4AaABAg.8X9YdotL2FD8X9brX1a_pZ","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy-xgV3WeXI8GRR5vZ4AaABAg.8X21IpT6-T_8X9_FHKU0Wq","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxUF0NgMk2XbjcOTLN4AaABAg.8Wlq_p0UDWX8WmNsKZjJwD","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzS0d_hiYY-las7zxB4AaABAg.8WibpzKM9lB8WihZ9c43b-","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzS0d_hiYY-las7zxB4AaABAg.8WibpzKM9lB8WiklrXRHzH","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxf3nZXVD3q_XEXGnh4AaABAg.8WiH55mNZN28WiiEw8UlFZ","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyEXtana9HUXy5iB0R4AaABAg.8WhLaHiOkMs8Wkuy5ihcl1","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzmIGscl53btE5R0OV4AaABAg.8Wguh4FSIdR8Wh1e0OcJbC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwh23tsbFv5YB11ioB4AaABAg.8WguBmEHjPL8WgxkxpVR-v","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwpEMUhCSHwQdFCei94AaABAg.AGE5EZ_NLwAAKcj6IBrKmO","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]