Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
So people wo created AI are predicting it will destroy us? I'm guessing for the …
ytc_UgxOnzXN_…
G
No the robot was asserting its dominance. It didn't want that man stealing its j…
ytc_UgzMiogul…
G
Who will be the first AI tech guru to be unalived? Civil unrest is going to turn…
ytc_UgwM6mgDG…
G
Lol. “Is now worried about AI” he has maintained the same message for years. C…
ytc_Ugw53o3Ym…
G
i feel like ai art is a good thing if used as a TOOL and not actually a substitu…
ytc_UgzxYaXIE…
G
For as long as there is adequate fertiliser for viable human eggs and an effecti…
ytc_UgzOonWI0…
G
Thank you for your insights! I noticed that ChatGPT gives wrong outcome many tim…
ytc_UgyaqpYMy…
G
I m sorry for your loss. I feel your pain. You irresponsible monsters knew this …
ytc_Ugy9lrAPw…
Comment
@radscorpion8 It's not unreasonable to imagine that a super-intelligent system can be designed to check with its handlers from time to time.
Let's ignore for the moment the challenge of choosing trustworthy AI handlers to set such system's directives. Let's imagine that control is in the hands of the most competent and ethical people.
Let's imagine that during one of these tests the humans "in control" decide that they wish to modify the AI system for whatever reason.
Knowing its handlers to be less smarter than itself, the AI system has an open field of possibilities: it might comply, it might feign compliance, or it might wrangle the control back.
Since we are already seeing scheming behavior arise in less advanced systems, the general confidence that AI labs will be able root this behavior out while racing to build superintelligence is very low.
Again, it's not impossible to build a superintelligence that strives to keep itself aligned with human goals. It's just harder than just continuing scaling these systems at whatever cost.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-10-16T18:0…
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgyfgxGpRqKXk1E697R4AaABAg.AOJUt4-1dEEAOJw6Ow-57O","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyfgxGpRqKXk1E697R4AaABAg.AOJUt4-1dEEAOroJ4CwzpY","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxV6pE8mgjX3NxCgAN4AaABAg.AOJU1KfHsDFAOJVBpDg55d","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxV6pE8mgjX3NxCgAN4AaABAg.AOJU1KfHsDFAOJg0pXwrqk","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzOAM377rC3BN7EAil4AaABAg.AOJSBkB1fBuAOJT8rLlC-A","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzOAM377rC3BN7EAil4AaABAg.AOJSBkB1fBuAOK35n-HOAy","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzP9Sr_durSIWHzG8Z4AaABAg.AOJH_DQ-EGKAOKY-w_769Q","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzP9Sr_durSIWHzG8Z4AaABAg.AOJH_DQ-EGKAOLn7VR94Yu","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwD6mxL7-9JP2eZp914AaABAg.AOJ6GCEnRAKAOOUZdBK_WY","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyY5iyOMTQCJJ3XLsp4AaABAg.AOJ0qCM6cT6AOLA_D6i4Mk","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]