Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
How did you setup ChatGPT to do this? I checked on the website and couldn’t figu…
ytc_UgxV6fCde…
G
Super AI will be able to breeze through security and have control over the world…
ytc_UgxRFwJ-r…
G
Once Ai can program VHDL and can produce the hardware, we will have a huge probl…
ytc_UgwLE35Pk…
G
Do you remember how back in the day people used to say that digital artists are …
ytc_UgxqOFwPl…
G
If you actually understand AI properly, in an academic and mathematical way, the…
ytr_Ugw5zfNQS…
G
i think i might create an AI generated image asking for inspiration in your art …
ytc_UgwBrKa9R…
G
AI is a tool and should be viewed as a tool. We need to adapt. Is it going to be…
ytc_UgxDHxGyg…
G
That first one could pass as not ai which is scary. The second one looked ai fro…
ytc_Ugy4KwSZs…
Comment
In the 1920s it was automated machines, in the 1950s it was robots and in the 1980s it was computers and the reason we ended up with even more work was how with each big revolution new products came around suddenly need more people as complexity of products also rises with the technological possibilities. Yes these technologies are always disruptive, but people despair because we look at the current market and think: Now everything can be done by these machines. Yes everything known at this point, but then suddenly new products or even more stuff get added to a product and it goes on.
The first cars were built by some dudes, a modern car is a high tech product with several hundred parts with a complex supply chain behind it. Unix was written in 6 weeks by two people, modern OS have literal thousands of developers behind them. When suddenly AI enables people to code faster with less efforts we can also make very complex software like games which were not conceivable at this point in time, and suddenly instead of hundreds programmers doing code you need hundreds of people specifying the programs and what AI has to do. We go from one meta layer to another.
What often is badly understood is how fast complexity explodes. There was a terrifyingly good example in a book about combinatorical optimization: If you have a drill and want to search the fastest path from each position, there are n! n possible routes to go (if I remember this formula correctly ...). For 2 holes that number is 4, for 3 this number is 18, for 20 it is already 4.8*10^19 and for 60 we reach ~5*10^83 which already exceeds the number of particles in the known universe ... ("The biggest shortcoming of mankind is that we don't understand the exponential function"). Think about it how this plays out for products. If a product is made of n components which (ideally) have one single point of failure, the possible ways of a product with 80 components to fail is 80! which is also more than the number of atoms in the universe....
We have now ever growing complexity of products on the one hand and a big portion of people leaving the workforce on the other. It is not unlikely that despite all bleak predictions AI just came at the right time to be even able to manage development of products in the future.
youtube
AI Governance
2025-08-07T13:3…
♥ 5
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzE30HAQluEyeGI76N4AaABAg.AL-l63a0wjsAL0awoXzdZj","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzE30HAQluEyeGI76N4AaABAg.AL-l63a0wjsALX3Yk6V-4Y","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwhT4v_y3p7DhfdMJ14AaABAg.AL-YtvTyzRqAL-ahSFsb2u","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxl9AzofNxpOOoSiMJ4AaABAg.AKthxHIdv8kAKvtoctnVfW","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxygOWcmwBzPO6Vg0B4AaABAg.AKtcDnKgHDKALAxAdMQy7I","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxDpai-SqtvuZnqjYt4AaABAg.AKr7y1_AjLJAL7FKSd7kmc","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxDpai-SqtvuZnqjYt4AaABAg.AKr7y1_AjLJAL7FaEu1QWi","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz67iDYjKR8HR2ii_R4AaABAg.AKpKozXGMCpAKryVWKi6ng","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz67iDYjKR8HR2ii_R4AaABAg.AKpKozXGMCpAKwQQ3kD9if","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz8CQcIgC8fk06zBcp4AaABAg.AKoT9Bpvgv2AKoX44dbtrC","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}
]