Raw LLM Responses

@RewindOGTeeHeewow, I guess I consider "abstract" meaningful now. At no point did I indicate I consider abstract truly meaningful, but hey thats interpretation as you rightfully say later in your response. I agree that we all have are own intrinsic value in things as an individual, thus I said if you find meaning in AI you aren't wrong by your own standards, sorry if it came off as a "backdoor." I was trying to say that I personally, disagree with the fact that AI is capable to be artistic on the way most normal people consider creative and appealing, especially when compared to works that are naturally made, physically or digitally. Also, at no point did I indicate that using photoshop to digitally create any artwork is on the same level as AI. As someone (who literally put in the prior response that "ideas and inspirations" are used, obviously indicating reference) understands that artist use different tools to create their OWN work. I'm even okay with AI assistance since it’s for certain parts, and yes, a person needs to be creative to create a specific generated work. I saw the Corridor Crew video on their process of AI anime, they did as you said, which is creative. But, I find the point is not that the creating the process isn't very meaningful, but rather it uses more "reference" by the mass. Instead of using the learned methods to create a piece. We all assign certain values to the works we see. I personally go by what the artist is trying to "say" or express. Because art is expression. AI is not really that since it purposely goes by the lazy nature of cutting corners. I find it more special when someone put more effort in getting there vision, BIT-BY-BIT, or at least the main processes of certain mediums. You seem to not understand what I find creative, to be fair, I might have made it ambiguous, but I hope I make it concrete now. You're taking my points and making them more based on a group/idea of opinions, rather than my own views. My views are that a person using even the most thought-full ways of AI, is not as special, or meaningful, or even AS creative than a person who creates with their own established process of making art. As you said, creativity of AI is limited by the person, due to the extra steps and process of AI being more practical than experimental imo, while a person with a concrete view of what they want exactly in every step of the process (which can depend on whatever medium) is able to express more originality too.