Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Some peole will go back to a life without tools at all, it will probably be the … ytc_Ugw8J27o7… G Discussion with grok: For me the only option to get rid of elevated risk of canc… ytc_Ugw4Ta2uC… G This is actually very true and it also allows the chatbot to better understand t… ytc_Ugz5IcDhc… G @mxmajewski Are you comparing hating on AI slop to actual genocides? Jesus you a… ytr_UgxvRTv-d… G Look closely at the robot it hits something and sparks shoot everywhere then thr… ytc_Ugy1D7ynf… G people joke about this stuff but it seriously is a threat. not much is stopping … ytc_UgyI3w_Kx… G It's official, and AI has revealed what the one *true* *religion* is. The Jedi O… ytc_UgzHYRqvl… G The scary thing is, the law is one area where people can actually be held accoun… ytc_Ugy1ERDap…

Comment

Disagree. The actual problem is that people keep wanting to approach this from a legal/illegal point of view. That's a losing argument. Deepfakes should NOT be illegal. It's literally not the person. It's literally not non-consensual porn. It is a fake. We have had fake porn since the internet, and before. Only difference is it's more realistic and easier to make. The answer is making it easier to sue creators of such content and remove such content from the internet. Personally, if such content required a disclaimer stating it is a parody, not real, just like how cartoons, ect, do when they have a character based on a real person appear on them, that is enough. Once again. It's art. Not real. Legislating it as thought it is a real nude lessens the impact of real non-consensual porn, and it completely opens freedom of artistic expression up to massive censorship. It's also not practical. Requiring disclaimers and tools to bring civil suite is both practical, already partially exists, and it protects freedom of artistic expression.

youtube AI Harm Incident 2023-05-22T01:0… ♥ 6

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	contractualist
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgzsKb_9aGWYZZOhCzZ4AaABAg.9pzTAW-CznD9pzVw1CiP9l","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzsKb_9aGWYZZOhCzZ4AaABAg.9pzTAW-CznD9pzYiIG9z-B","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxKEvIo0Ybp81UcRed4AaABAg.9pzRvfPdcSJ9pzfi_waVSP","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyY_MpVgjktRfuENgR4AaABAg.9pzR5c7SZ5s9pzRe1Fbpnv","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyV1iuCVbiUArKqcvx4AaABAg.9pzQcGlt9fe9q-TPa03v6f","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgysmcHA_0l5xhyEsV94AaABAg.9pzPCq4nN9h9pzr0dRxs_K","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgysmcHA_0l5xhyEsV94AaABAg.9pzPCq4nN9h9q-CBnOoDbd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyHEMdOGrjVkISEnPB4AaABAg.9pzO_ryBR0P9pzTroTKIua","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyHEMdOGrjVkISEnPB4AaABAg.9pzO_ryBR0P9pzU_EPUBxG","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyHEMdOGrjVkISEnPB4AaABAg.9pzO_ryBR0P9pzb7HngWs4","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]

Raw LLM Responses