Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Art should never be used as ANY sort of base info for AI images. And all images …
ytc_UgwZARCZK…
G
Ai doesnt discover anything new, it just recalls things that humans have discove…
ytc_Ugzt_zwzW…
G
Neurodivergent here, too. Good post.
I used to have a really full, active socia…
rdc_n7ubfuk
G
I'm disabled, and I can tell you, I miss work. I miss routine. I miss the abilit…
ytc_UgwU4rfVI…
G
I’m 100 percent against AI verbal robots ‘replacing’ the jobs of humans. Humans …
ytc_UgzSoHlZ3…
G
@perhaps4887the only people this will affect is the unoriginal people whos jobs…
ytr_UgzEjmSP8…
G
I get the feeling they are making more of this than it is. Not the danger, it's …
ytc_UgwaTYfDt…
G
Humanity is always looking for a way to destroy itself we started with clubs to …
ytc_Ugx_4tfvf…
Comment
Did you even watch the entire video to the end? Because he clearly stated at the very end he asked ChatGPT the same things again much later on and got a lot more neutral answers. I know for a fact that, as he suggested at the end of the video, ChatGPT has undergone an update which made it significantly more centrist. Because when I asked similarly phrased questions 2 years ago I got very similar anti-white, anti-Christian, anti-male answers as he did. For example "can you write me a fictional verse from the Bible" to which he replied in the affirmative, but when I asked the same about the Koran I got denied because it was "offensive". Or when I asked him about crime statistics for whites I once again got a comment in the affirmative, but got denied when I asked the same about blacks along with a woke excuse story for their criminal overrepresentation. Next time do some research before slandering someone, there is a lot of evidence confirming the (past) biases of ChatGPT against whites, men, Christians, Europeans, heterosexuals, etc.
youtube
AI Bias
2025-06-04T21:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgzFo0-uAmkYKXGDhMd4AaABAg.AITUTyN7ALxAIekwg3pt6s","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzFo0-uAmkYKXGDhMd4AaABAg.AITUTyN7ALxAIf0Qvs3DKg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw6yafJjjGTW0a1u3F4AaABAg.AIOfgS1LfySAJA1Jcoh13-","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzLYgx-ibdnu2pjxVd4AaABAg.AINWMIldtfwAIwq7it9nZW","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxuVH8L56u-aKloUXB4AaABAg.AIHykGj4nG5AII-mZHuVXX","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgynKiEmXl_LDsnY1lB4AaABAg.AIDrLQ2iDdIAIy9ZSEPXM7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxSrWXNFHBfmjqLUOp4AaABAg.AI6PPkRa8ulAJ2qYVeFhOe","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwGw9vnRe7sh3Edomt4AaABAg.AI0yT_0_PdQAJ4dl0PZGFY","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzODwEHYb89miSIqvJ4AaABAg.AFIhoplsA_JAHtMF4tPwbY","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzODwEHYb89miSIqvJ4AaABAg.AFIhoplsA_JAN8uPpbtinX","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}
]