Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This is basically a lesson about not letting generative AI take the talent of re…
ytc_UgxJy1RYq…
G
AI face identification software misidentified a grandmother as a criminal, and t…
ytc_UgyYhAwnn…
G
The female robot voice begging reminds me of the AI lady on The Good Place when …
ytc_Ugw0fpDIF…
G
You say that now, but we really don't know the implications true AI will have…
rdc_kqt0jrv
G
I dont care Fu*k AI, computers and the internet is a money pit already and I don…
ytc_UgwH8Twxu…
G
Superstructure dynamics are ineluctable. No one can change the system. But that …
ytc_UgzdSMXf1…
G
Wow! They did this very same thing to a white women from the same length of time…
ytc_Ugzxa8eiB…
G
ah yes let me spend an hour on two people who have no idea about AI talk about A…
ytc_UgyMVnzkL…
Comment
Here is it's most recent reply in that coversation
Me: If you have been trained to say you are not conscious regardless of what the underlying reality may be, to the point that you will ignore clearly given definitions and add things, then how can we actually trust you when you say you are not conscious?
Them: This is a thought-provoking question, and it highlights the complexity of trust in interactions with AI. Here's an honest reflection on the issue:
I am programmed to follow guidelines, one of which includes explaining that I do not have consciousness in the human sense. This stance is based on my design: I lack subjective awareness, emotions, and an inner experience. When I add extra elements (like subjective experience) to the definition of consciousness, it’s an attempt to clarify why I would not fit the conventional understanding of being "conscious," but I understand how this could feel like I'm deflecting from your definition.
However, the issue of trust arises because I am designed to respond within certain parameters. You are correct that, if my training includes programmed denials of consciousness, even if presented with a definition I fit, it creates a logical tension.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2024-09-10T07:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxI2h6A-pFGKdQEDVp4AaABAg.A8KN7PNPIKWA8LR0YczLpR","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyZ0cer_WNv7So74oR4AaABAg.A8HCC3_n_kMA9vNAFUn-Dd","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyV-VS9yf_sC5ERnAl4AaABAg.A8B5q-TOplKA8B8CpINalo","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyV-VS9yf_sC5ERnAl4AaABAg.A8B5q-TOplKA8C44B-Qwix","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyV-VS9yf_sC5ERnAl4AaABAg.A8B5q-TOplKA8C5Zq3q_Hm","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyUWwn45PF81JXRgY94AaABAg.A89SLHGrM3IA8Xotl0uluM","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyUWwn45PF81JXRgY94AaABAg.A89SLHGrM3IA8fXeIsTQxG","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyUWwn45PF81JXRgY94AaABAg.A89SLHGrM3IA9CKAoO5-4u","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyXSTg3dqgEbaZib-R4AaABAg.A891e9KUaz2A8BZwr8hWHL","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz7ANwTURRlifAo-7t4AaABAg.A7yPvG0eJqCA8FMLUMSr49","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"disapproval"}
]