Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Yes and no! I did my thesis on animal rights, and we have so many different mea… rdc_ofexdq1 G Exemple si on veut lui changer quelque chose elle fait en sorte que ça n'arrive … ytr_UgyuUXsAf… G @Spe-chann For copyright, I don't think so, you can copyright a drawing specifi… ytr_UgznQgjJP… G Any „soul“ that an ai generated artwork could have, is the soul that the artist … ytc_UgyfHmJjz… G When you tell a robot that its mother sucks like a vacuum and blows like a fan..… ytc_UgxK2L9Ut… G “Deflationary” ok buddy, bc corporations are lining up to lower prices. All the … ytc_UgwBiR4DY… G I hear what you're saying but could I suggest that you not look at where AI is n… ytr_Ugw-xt2js… G Jst so you know, this won’t prevent ai, you have to use websites that change the… ytc_Ugwd5NnqH…

Comment

Oh this is a really good take to have, because it fixes one fundamental flaw with the soullessness argument. Only calling AI art "soulless" leaves the opening of a potential future in which the machine may achieve that benchmark of seeming to have soul. But taking this angle, which honestly also just seems more accurate to me since it doesn't rely on something so abstract to be understandable, makes the AI ever reaching this standard a categorical impossibility. At least in the generalizable function of these models, which compile, mix and return sets of existing data without a unique perspective of its own (...wait, dangit, you could argue that the AI's definition of "accuracy" could be said to be that unique perspective), these programs won't ever really be able to mimic the effect of just a single artist's soul at the heart of the process to get the results. As I've realized right there, the goalposts are still subjective with this argument, but I'd say they are at least less so than when trying to attribute "a soul" to any given piece of art.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-05-15T02:5… ♥ 4

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	unclear
Reasoning	mixed
Policy	unclear
Emotion	approval
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgzZqPGSP5g1RWjJtv54AaABAg.AI7Jw28pyDxAI92KgNHg6r","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugyd1MTuAshu-1q7KkR4AaABAg.AI7DK79eb7oAIHLh4xcjwu","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxJyna4GtKpOGVgOXF4AaABAg.AI78STVEztqAIGHJLRaQNt","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzdrvhtALY51m5bE3t4AaABAg.AI75EfiL0zOAJ1wJlLaOqA","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw8L7e_Np1TKkzUV_h4AaABAg.AI6xR6K8VUxAJ6FVOU7rtY","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwJAXwgQ3k9EB-upIN4AaABAg.AI6tm7ltOHIAI7RlExc6DJ","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzQw2PcN7XYIL6IpY94AaABAg.AI6tGV99RbnAI9CcRj3yPY","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzQw2PcN7XYIL6IpY94AaABAg.AI6tGV99RbnAIGPsLAJbYZ","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzQw2PcN7XYIL6IpY94AaABAg.AI6tGV99RbnAIGd5GcTTg7","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyU8XsWqusLj9RTVmt4AaABAg.AI6jYyBXW7RAI7ch5Y-Pjq","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses