Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G AI looks like shit though. there's no instance of a beatiful AI creation. It's a… ytr_UgyumzVen… G This is an exponentially changing (read growing) technology. Robots will be comi… ytc_UgyBRMh3R… G The ai bro's get so mean and angry because deep down they know they could never … ytc_UgyrxA1mK… G How will voice acting even work if its ai generated? The mouth movements will be… ytr_UgyJIOJbg… G We already had quarantine a few years back. Teachers are still seeing the diffe… ytc_Ugzp0qKYd… G Sometimes İ talk with Aİ Annie. İ am so impressed with Aİ's answers. İ feel like… ytc_UgxmHm2js… G Duh..data centers and AI (which truly is not real, thus "artificial ") are all p… ytc_Ugznd2Tsv… G Why bother the extra expense to make it look human.its still a robot. Why disgui… ytc_Ugx4hE8qG…

Comment

Yes and no. Because AI needs an input (and an output) prompt, the current way it works probably won't do the full set of tasks better than a human can. If the only aim was productivity, humans working with AI would probably be the most effective. Thing is, which few people account for: Companies hate workers. Personnel costs is the majority of costs of most (if not all) companies. So even if AI will do the job worse than people, *it would still be worth it for the companies.* Cutting some production in favor of vastly lowered costs (we're talking 50% or something), would probably be a winning strategy. Not only that, but by cutting workers off of production, you remove their power. Strikes? Useless. Boycotts? Outdated. Unions? Pointless. Without being tied to production, workers can't make a reason for companies to care about their rights or needs. So basically, AI probably won't be as good as humans are, but it doesn't need to be. It just needs to be good enough.

youtube AI Jobs 2025-09-10T22:3… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	regulate
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_Ugyj4hmaQ7m2ABDVKwZ4AaABAg.AMv64sHUSOmAMw0hCsg3_E","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwbFVeBPLe-u8hUcSN4AaABAg.AMucBAnSrfVAMva3jtb-ye","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy0bB56BfpdtS-1_u14AaABAg.AMuEjiNzuQRAMu_i0N-yEy","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy0bB56BfpdtS-1_u14AaABAg.AMuEjiNzuQRAMviBII6Tgn","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy0bB56BfpdtS-1_u14AaABAg.AMuEjiNzuQRAMvi_UQDGul","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxdPJEGAbpI5rB-Svh4AaABAg.AE_Cn_ZPUOjAPchAc6vuQn","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzHyOQBTTjDmIyBO5d4AaABAg.AEQqMR514UtARylXQgKw2o","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxHfGnh5L7CdBhzQvF4AaABAg.AEPGOMfszOMAPch3Oa4M2V","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzH6AIwAo7-NJjkrmJ4AaABAg.A0oHwbHLDfyA0xSbW9xpLy","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw1i8eGpRAK2YvzMH94AaABAg.9rxxb5j63hI9sJX5ANahNN","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses