Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
How many ways can AI destroy humanity. I'm a microchipped test subject. Imagine …
ytc_Ugyaq_J_-…
G
Humans have goals and that is to survive. Religion, and tribalism is because we …
ytc_UgwFJOYRZ…
G
That's a kind of questionable argument. Advances in technology have consistently…
rdc_g69l4at
G
Honestly, humans integrating with AI could be inevitable. That's the whole point…
ytc_UgyxRJjSq…
G
What I find also quite interesting is that, although the devil is a deceiver, he…
ytc_Ugx7BQK_0…
G
The underpants gnomes have just leveled up their game. 1. Steal underpants 2. ??…
ytc_Ugyv1u7ls…
G
A,I isn't taking over anything or gonna kill us all The hands that are controlin…
ytc_UgxJSgKQp…
G
Ok yeah the ai sucks but it's still funny that Facebook mom's really thinking th…
ytc_UgzIGKue_…
Comment
You're right, finding a number to represent the probability of either of these outcomes would be complete speculation. Comparing them to each other, however, is possible. If we approach it as a limit problem there is a clear winner. Given infinite time and infinite compute, and given aging as a problem with technical solutions, the problem of aging will eventually be solved. On the other hand, AI destroying humanity is a scenario and not a problem with potential technical solutions. It is one of many potential scenarios, none of which are guaranteed to occur, even with infinite time and compute. It's not clear that slowing down development in AI, even if it were possible, would decrease the probability of the doomsday AI scenario. It would, however, decrease the likelihood that advances in AI help to solve the problem (and the existential threat) of aging within our lifetimes.
youtube
AI Governance
2023-07-17T06:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxGaW9p18AEp5IotE94AaABAg.9rcov6TyeMk9sG0KIycBlk","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz-I_5z2MH1F-xN_bt4AaABAg.9ra7EGbrpwC9s-nH-OgPNs","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz-I_5z2MH1F-xN_bt4AaABAg.9ra7EGbrpwC9tOj5W4zn70","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzUXE2d9iCAiRPKfyN4AaABAg.9rYaYPPO-7MA72SGK_7Aqz","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy8fQDWMBP-0LRsOAB4AaABAg.9rTdNN4aeVh9rY9ZyGIH8X","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy8fQDWMBP-0LRsOAB4AaABAg.9rTdNN4aeVh9ra3e-kPDb_","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz8-e_-RYQnkl5h3MN4AaABAg.9rT0qF094RK9rTtn13CD3K","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxcuDNaybYEsp5vnLZ4AaABAg.9rT-uSfjN9d9rTLwqFhvnA","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwH-6hm87UtoueFPWt4AaABAg.9rSv5z5xe2O9rWNAl3PZiG","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwH-6hm87UtoueFPWt4AaABAg.9rSv5z5xe2O9rsZ4ItlwZY","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]