Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Not suprised that open ai takes out the guy that wants the AI to do good things.…
ytc_UgwJHYsoV…
G
I think.the deepfakes thing lacks the political will to address it because it wi…
ytc_Ugyq4DRQv…
G
So do this also apply to ai music? (Not ai cover but original ai music)…
ytc_UgzvI9DIT…
G
Remember, Paying for commision to real artists is always better than doing AI ar…
ytc_UgxhcBAW2…
G
AI is like many people's knowledge across centuries and cultures talking to you …
ytc_Ugx6tEDLI…
G
Thank goodness for the champions in here letting us know it's not a real robot.…
ytc_Ugwi6WjXI…
G
ChatGPT is never mean for health advices. But it still can be good with a lot im…
ytc_UgwoVdLqH…
G
As someone who’s done both (or at least made original art and then describe it t…
ytc_UgznXKzBF…
Comment
You're right, finding a number to represent the probability of either of these outcomes would be complete speculation. Comparing them to each other, however, is possible. If we approach it as a limit problem there is a clear winner. Given infinite time and infinite compute, and given aging as a problem with technical solutions, the problem of aging will eventually be solved. On the other hand, AI destroying humanity is a scenario and not a problem with potential technical solutions. It is one of many potential scenarios, none of which are guaranteed to occur, even with infinite time and compute. It's not clear that slowing down development in AI, even if it were possible, would decrease the probability of the doomsday AI scenario. It would, however, decrease the likelihood that advances in AI help to solve the problem (and the existential threat) of aging within our lifetimes.
youtube
AI Governance
2023-07-17T06:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgxGaW9p18AEp5IotE94AaABAg.9rcov6TyeMk9sG0KIycBlk","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz-I_5z2MH1F-xN_bt4AaABAg.9ra7EGbrpwC9s-nH-OgPNs","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz-I_5z2MH1F-xN_bt4AaABAg.9ra7EGbrpwC9tOj5W4zn70","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzUXE2d9iCAiRPKfyN4AaABAg.9rYaYPPO-7MA72SGK_7Aqz","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy8fQDWMBP-0LRsOAB4AaABAg.9rTdNN4aeVh9rY9ZyGIH8X","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy8fQDWMBP-0LRsOAB4AaABAg.9rTdNN4aeVh9ra3e-kPDb_","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz8-e_-RYQnkl5h3MN4AaABAg.9rT0qF094RK9rTtn13CD3K","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxcuDNaybYEsp5vnLZ4AaABAg.9rT-uSfjN9d9rTLwqFhvnA","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwH-6hm87UtoueFPWt4AaABAg.9rSv5z5xe2O9rWNAl3PZiG","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwH-6hm87UtoueFPWt4AaABAg.9rSv5z5xe2O9rsZ4ItlwZY","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]