Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Excellent to bring awareness to this issue. The most harmful part however is the… ytc_UgzqJRWG9… G AI will take every job period For the people that's trained on AI is just helpi… ytc_Ugz_Efx-j… G Its called creative destruction. Do you want to return to the day when 50% of a… ytc_Ugz6dqGUZ… G It also implicitly lies when it says "I", as it's not a person and has no self/e… ytc_UgwLNiPHP… G I seriously don't get the 'AI art is theft' argument. To use a metaphor, when a … ytc_UgySqHe9n… G I see the point, however there isn't much difference when comparing it with conc… ytc_UgxAd7lq_… G So please destroy this robot quick in present it is so dangerous in our future… ytc_UgwiVQnsd… G how ironic below the description he wrote himself theres an ai generated descrip… ytc_Ugy901L41…

Comment

@vinchino You are going off on a tangent, the issue has nothing to do with whether ai is inspired the same way humans are inspired. That's a separate philosophical argument. It's an interesting philosophical question whether or not ai learns like humans, but it doesn't pertain to the issue. The issue at the hand is whether ai companies have permission to train their ai on artists' works. They don't. Artists have explicitly said they don't want ai training from their work. They are okay with humans training from their work, it's actually a time honored tradition to allow artists to learn from other artists. As long as the ai companies don't have permission to use artists' work in the training set, what they are engaged in is theft. This is why artists and companies like Getty images, which do get permission from artists to use their work are upset by what the ai companies have done. It's why politicians have asked if the ai has compensated artists and musicians for their work, when they've grilled ai people in congress and parliaments around the world.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2023-06-19T17:1… ♥ 41

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	liability
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgxBh90gJR8ZTeMHzaZ4AaABAg.9r85OggmfHj9r8UDoXC5wW","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxBh90gJR8ZTeMHzaZ4AaABAg.9r85OggmfHj9r90S0FzO1d","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxBh90gJR8ZTeMHzaZ4AaABAg.9r85OggmfHj9r9cmOD5dSF","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Uguz9ZUNdLQ4P-nGBRvh4AaABAg.9r84j8flVyC9r9NNXUc3Vt","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxUSTNSriDQAPAAoNd4AaABAg.9r8-0I5sRog9r978whJZnq","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwyj-cM7vEP-M8lwaV4AaABAg.9r7vXBJUUv69r8FxlhcGJp","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwyj-cM7vEP-M8lwaV4AaABAg.9r7vXBJUUv69r97XI0Fer9","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwyj-cM7vEP-M8lwaV4AaABAg.9r7vXBJUUv69rHiUaRRoX9","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyKE3XtlXT-lnhbJiV4AaABAg.9r7nwYYjFgi9r98GQjXiOP","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgybHLAUcuVB6cVdEBB4AaABAg.9r7dW8urTFk9rB1FGqiQpM","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses