Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Yeah right now it's still tedious to work with AI in many cases. But it's pretty…
ytr_UgwlyzHHb…
G
Calling yourself an ai """"""""artist"""""""""" is like seeing someone walk and …
ytc_UgysoChRp…
G
Its just sad that this comment section has boiled down to "orange man bad" and o…
ytc_UgySYFAK6…
G
The AI will take over and control everyone…except the Irish ☘️
Or
They will bui…
ytc_Ugxz3aIms…
G
Is chatgpt's response different? In Indonesia, his answer isn't like that. He us…
ytc_UgxD8QYK1…
G
The problem with your point of view on ai is that you believe every single perso…
ytr_UgwG2nQpt…
G
Satan is a Jinn 🧞 👽🦸 Avatar 👾 American's!!
Santa 🎅 is a Satan (Jinn Demon) = Par…
ytc_UgxocRDDo…
G
When the pattern recognizing ai recognizes patterns and they have to lobotomize …
ytc_UgwSNZBOo…
Comment
Quick TL;DR - We can't choose one, because AI is just competent enough to be preferred over paying human beings, but not competent enough to have any artistic value.
Thing is, it is hopelessly incompetent, but it is passable enough for corporations to choose it. Because it's cheaper to produce, than paying actual human beings. I like to think of myself as an artist, and I can churn out around two-three decent-looking drawings per day. AI will produce around a hundred in that time.
But, as usual, corporations prioritise quantity over quality. I've seen some coffee shops use AI-generated art, which looks _passable_ from afar, but downright hideous, if you squint. Actual art can have details and accidental blemishes, that show the person behind it, who might have put special care into certain parts. AI does not.
Also, AI """art""" is usually just a bunch of remixed works, sourced from artists who do not want their art used that way, but techbros only care about someone's rights to any imagery, when it's an NFT, or some other trash.
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2024-02-15T14:3…
♥ 11
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugz5YuxhcUXzlmEzxiF4AaABAg.A-r059SyBsvA027Zwp3KMv","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwpipkwNK-QofPykB14AaABAg.A-gnSWTkmpuA-qIKkkqDdN","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwpipkwNK-QofPykB14AaABAg.A-gnSWTkmpuA-qunfLZiS9","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwpipkwNK-QofPykB14AaABAg.A-gnSWTkmpuA-r-1imcQuE","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz8ReCLbLoXrfBK1qB4AaABAg.A-Ozjh46wb4A-xyadxh32z","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwQZqwFSX9wef1zeQ54AaABAg.A-CGt9N7FFbA-FAU3FDDkY","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwQZqwFSX9wef1zeQ54AaABAg.A-CGt9N7FFbA-FDinhw3yh","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwQZqwFSX9wef1zeQ54AaABAg.A-CGt9N7FFbA-FGRPQyY63","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyTTAfL-DHOiqzVcy94AaABAg.A--gSEA9kQQA-fx9ogbEAB","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx6fyT4cXBg732suAx4AaABAg.9zypmoiB-MJA-CdbHY2Vka","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]