Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Absolutely not an AI art defender. I think it's trash. But I also think modern a…
ytc_UgzjpireL…
G
If an automated support line ever says "bummer" like that to me I will lose my s…
ytc_UgwwYGhja…
G
AI is hell going for us, the biggest thief in the world it should be banned from…
ytc_Ugx9LYpM7…
G
We dont exterminate ants because we know they have a role in the ecosystem we li…
ytr_UgzSoDfSw…
G
but those LLMs are NOT intelligent they're just called ai for sales. they're glo…
ytc_UgwD-S2aY…
G
I'd highly recommend Jacque Fresco in the topic of automation
The Problem with…
ytc_Ugxf6x6LE…
G
The civil liberties arguments are one thing, but I find the racism arguments aga…
ytc_Ugwdqoo_v…
G
You hit the nail on the head with swe - full disclosure, am mid level swe myself…
rdc_ieok67a
Comment
@primmakinsofis614 well, no. That doesn't apply to movies and tv and scripts where a human CONTROLS the AI, which certainly would be done in Hollywood. Here's the actual rule:
"The determination as to whether a person is an author of a work created using a computer program will be a factual one. If the person controlling the program can be seen as directing or fashioning the material form of the work, it will likely be protected as a computer‑assisted work. But, if the person does not contribute sufficient independent intellectual effort to satisfy the Act’s requirement for originality, the individual using the program would likely not be considered its author.”
SO...if I give the AI original material to fashion and/or I fashion what it creates, I'm a human being crafting the work with a tool, effectively no different than using a word processor with spellcheck. Sorry, but thanks for playing--the studios wouldn't be investing hundreds of millions in this stuff NOT to own it and control the financial rights and results.
youtube
AI Jobs
2023-08-30T22:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgwhcWllFdBw9TYOc214AaABAg.9u1iwPqgmks9u2yXsCr6w7","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwhcWllFdBw9TYOc214AaABAg.9u1iwPqgmks9u31IUv8Mc2","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxDSP8wx8vUz94oNup4AaABAg.9u162O5uqlD9u2xYKBmqiA","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzAj3IIaCQ4YEVPZLd4AaABAg.9u10ie2TyZ29uePcTu5n_g","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxBNCyRDFBc_Ux9cRF4AaABAg.9u0slOo7Rc39u2xfBTYEaw","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw_0hIWuwC1fruKRfl4AaABAg.9u0o6UV9k4l9u2xmw18V1Z","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw45ZKtSwzqXS9tUxl4AaABAg.9u0jboZ2euf9ueQ4zFlJnR","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzMkW5VfqkNei2Nm794AaABAg.9u0bDbxvWei9u2pUVpf_Sg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzMkW5VfqkNei2Nm794AaABAg.9u0bDbxvWei9u2ybHX_x4X","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwbYqwVB_etC-L4Lsl4AaABAg.9u0b0wiXaNU9u2y1IoALnT","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]