Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Evolution of A.I. in real time. First they became "sentient", exercised free wil…
ytc_Ugz5dDcc4…
G
Can Americans pay me just to talk to a friend or be their adviser? Instead of ta…
ytc_UgwEAefh2…
G
Douglas Adams wrote his AIs with an enduring sense of job satisfaction. So we ca…
ytc_UgwR6bB6e…
G
Some comments ive read on AI videos are "I don't care that its AI I still think …
ytc_UgxPu566m…
G
AI is dumb, can't even add correctly when numbers are bigger. not sure why peopl…
ytc_Ugz50qdvc…
G
First there were hupe with cryptocurrencies, now AI, next they'll invent snother…
ytc_UgxiuQh-7…
G
this is not a people problem. this is a post-COVID issue with the new generation…
ytr_UgxZYT29P…
G
So basically you used ai already, you just wanted your pay to stay the same?…
ytc_UgyIWCTWR…
Comment
"Leading the way on ethical AI deployment" functions as legitimation theater—corporations positioning themselves as responsible stewards to preempt binding regulation. IBM's "governance frameworks" aren't constraints on corporate power but voluntary commitments easily discarded when profitable. Notice how "ethics" always means self-regulation: companies drafting their own principles, auditing their own compliance, defining harm on their own terms. This isn't accountability; it's regulatory capture before regulation even exists. The real governance question isn't whether businesses need "reliable frameworks" but who controls those frameworks and in whose interest. Corporate-led ethics initiatives systematically exclude affected communities, labor, and public interest advocates while centering business concerns like "innovation" and "competitiveness." Responsible AI governance would look like external oversight, mandatory impact assessments, worker councils with veto power, and enforceable penalties—not executive pledges and industry partnerships.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2025-11-17T09:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugx9OLAA3Z4FOwfk20l4AaABAg.AS_vOhIRKvSASaINwoceoZ","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy1BotzE-zR5CfQlnV4AaABAg.AC2LEyLGc8iAC2PXx2mX5X","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgjjhVmopdBPnngCoAEC.8BsAm4xHtuS8BtL1-4lmhu","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UghK9JWzzYfksHgCoAEC.8BrrReLGHpH8Bs2iLAUyj7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UggrhJ60UdmN_3gCoAEC.8BrrEAPregI8BtAGWVJG1k","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgigfbsD3xVn6XgCoAEC.8BrcF8D9mNF8BsC33aqVbL","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgibUnXWq06xDXgCoAEC.8BrbvRz8MRl8Bru_8BqsTy","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwh3v-8GeoSdSmne4B4AaABAg.A3T1yHwit-FAPcJByxRXmy","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzF-wZJ569On403PCR4AaABAg.A3QWkoAMNS1APcJO2RR4NT","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz1b6hJ0hdS_gdTq4F4AaABAg.AHFbF0naRvIAIoHqlCUyiT","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}
]