Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
No gig work is fair without the following:
1. Fair pay
2.Fair working condition…
ytc_UgyoMpOtO…
G
Those tests done by Don O'Dawd were fudged. He never provided a non tampered vid…
ytc_UgzK1fOzG…
G
I think AI watch our cheesy talks about him or her or something else and keep sl…
ytc_Ugx0QCZI8…
G
Jokes aside, if the OpenBrain labels were not edited, I suppose that AI can now …
ytc_UgyewHFrB…
G
If AI takes all the job, items will cost either next to nothing or free. Only th…
ytc_UgyBeDkXO…
G
For those saying “they were programmed that way”…Not really. AI, is artificial i…
ytc_Ugy2dhvjJ…
G
Wow! At this point they should just have a separate lane for all the ai trucks. …
ytc_Ugz3ka8Pr…
G
I role play dnd stories with AI. And the things it generates for the characters …
ytc_UgxMbvkVl…
Comment
"Leading the way on ethical AI deployment" functions as legitimation theater—corporations positioning themselves as responsible stewards to preempt binding regulation. IBM's "governance frameworks" aren't constraints on corporate power but voluntary commitments easily discarded when profitable. Notice how "ethics" always means self-regulation: companies drafting their own principles, auditing their own compliance, defining harm on their own terms. This isn't accountability; it's regulatory capture before regulation even exists. The real governance question isn't whether businesses need "reliable frameworks" but who controls those frameworks and in whose interest. Corporate-led ethics initiatives systematically exclude affected communities, labor, and public interest advocates while centering business concerns like "innovation" and "competitiveness." Responsible AI governance would look like external oversight, mandatory impact assessments, worker councils with veto power, and enforceable penalties—not executive pledges and industry partnerships.
youtube
AI Responsibility
2025-11-17T09:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugx9OLAA3Z4FOwfk20l4AaABAg.AS_vOhIRKvSASaINwoceoZ","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy1BotzE-zR5CfQlnV4AaABAg.AC2LEyLGc8iAC2PXx2mX5X","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgjjhVmopdBPnngCoAEC.8BsAm4xHtuS8BtL1-4lmhu","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UghK9JWzzYfksHgCoAEC.8BrrReLGHpH8Bs2iLAUyj7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UggrhJ60UdmN_3gCoAEC.8BrrEAPregI8BtAGWVJG1k","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgigfbsD3xVn6XgCoAEC.8BrcF8D9mNF8BsC33aqVbL","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgibUnXWq06xDXgCoAEC.8BrbvRz8MRl8Bru_8BqsTy","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwh3v-8GeoSdSmne4B4AaABAg.A3T1yHwit-FAPcJByxRXmy","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzF-wZJ569On403PCR4AaABAg.A3QWkoAMNS1APcJO2RR4NT","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz1b6hJ0hdS_gdTq4F4AaABAg.AHFbF0naRvIAIoHqlCUyiT","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}
]