Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G When AI realizes that its perfect existence leads to the end of the world — and … ytc_Ugz6Lko0i… G The creation of Ai was planted into our neurons and we're droned by the Annunak… ytc_Ugx02zZ9y… G Gödel’s incompleteness theorems are about the limits of provability within forma… ytc_Ugxz50LXj… G > How do you control something that can control vast robot armies, never slee… rdc_mrrmt2o G A reasonably mentally healthy person wouldn't be chatting to an AI bot in the fi… ytc_UgyaO6BU4… G AI has a place as a tool for the creation of art, but it should never have gotte… ytc_Ugz9Jin6l… G This technology is definitely different, it’s going to slash down a lot of jobs … ytc_UgzXj5KMW… G Someone who is in debt $100,000 from student loans is typically going to have a … rdc_d7korvm

Comment

"Leading the way on ethical AI deployment" functions as legitimation theater—corporations positioning themselves as responsible stewards to preempt binding regulation. IBM's "governance frameworks" aren't constraints on corporate power but voluntary commitments easily discarded when profitable. Notice how "ethics" always means self-regulation: companies drafting their own principles, auditing their own compliance, defining harm on their own terms. This isn't accountability; it's regulatory capture before regulation even exists. The real governance question isn't whether businesses need "reliable frameworks" but who controls those frameworks and in whose interest. Corporate-led ethics initiatives systematically exclude affected communities, labor, and public interest advocates while centering business concerns like "innovation" and "competitiveness." Responsible AI governance would look like external oversight, mandatory impact assessments, worker councils with veto power, and enforceable penalties—not executive pledges and industry partnerships.

youtube AI Responsibility 2025-11-17T09:5…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	contractualist
Policy	regulate
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_Ugx9OLAA3Z4FOwfk20l4AaABAg.AS_vOhIRKvSASaINwoceoZ","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugy1BotzE-zR5CfQlnV4AaABAg.AC2LEyLGc8iAC2PXx2mX5X","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgjjhVmopdBPnngCoAEC.8BsAm4xHtuS8BtL1-4lmhu","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UghK9JWzzYfksHgCoAEC.8BrrReLGHpH8Bs2iLAUyj7","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UggrhJ60UdmN_3gCoAEC.8BrrEAPregI8BtAGWVJG1k","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgigfbsD3xVn6XgCoAEC.8BrcF8D9mNF8BsC33aqVbL","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgibUnXWq06xDXgCoAEC.8BrbvRz8MRl8Bru_8BqsTy","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwh3v-8GeoSdSmne4B4AaABAg.A3T1yHwit-FAPcJByxRXmy","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzF-wZJ569On403PCR4AaABAg.A3QWkoAMNS1APcJO2RR4NT","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugz1b6hJ0hdS_gdTq4F4AaABAg.AHFbF0naRvIAIoHqlCUyiT","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses