Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G The harder they push to make a generally intelligent AI, the more they're realiz… ytc_UgwYU39ZL… G At this stage, the opinion you presented here is a hot take. You also completely… ytc_UgwU86RWp… G So in other words Vibe code for tools you need. I think we need another term for… ytc_Ugxx3AK9x… G Even if superintelligence doesn't happen, it's already bad enough. We are turbof… ytc_Ugx9z5YYW… G @SeanBoyce-gp literally just google "ai safety research" or "interpretability re… ytr_UgyoHjqod… G Human has the ability to think beyond Super Intelligence, it will not take not m… ytc_UgxNQyO3a… G I think AI will just enable us to wipe ourselves out by consuming the planet the… ytc_Ugz9ASwLg… G > Don't use Nightshade, it's abusive towards AI companies/customers! > Nightshad… ytc_UgzSEaKtc…

Comment

@thewannabecritic7490 That's exactly what I feared before I started. But no. Text 2 Image requires excellent use of language to produce something original. And there's a great deal of learning how the samplers and checkpoints react to each prompt. My input level is quite high, and why I think of it as a collaboration. The first thing to know is generative AI doesn't just find an existing piece of art that's roughly in the ballpark, and copy that. It rarely does that. Especially if I'm trying to produce something original. Photorealistic images of existing people might be the times it does reach for existing work to copy, but i discourage photorealism. I want AI to make the things that can't be photographed. Personally I'm obsessed with the 'painterly' side of things; trying to produce original classical-style portraits in my own style. By that I mean I completely opposed prompts containing "In the style of Rembrandt" or whoever. THAT, imo, would be cheating. It would be copying Rembrandt's (or whoever's) flourishes, motifs, and possibly existing works.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-09-01T18:2…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	user
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	none
Emotion	approval
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgxcfUpR29O5m2a3FyF4AaABAg.AMqRdFN9V7NAObDMdOIqfg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxXZhkCuTObkmcpZep4AaABAg.AMjCNYX1upjAMoBJH27m9B","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxXZhkCuTObkmcpZep4AaABAg.AMjCNYX1upjAMpGrJf5fPN","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxXZhkCuTObkmcpZep4AaABAg.AMjCNYX1upjAMqoJYtwuh8","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxocgow7cE2vgQBmEh4AaABAg.AMfJqI1Z_D7AMilar-bRK1","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzCmTu1MSjvX6ZNF8x4AaABAg.AMb4TJCGTT5AMbfIQgh-KJ","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzCmTu1MSjvX6ZNF8x4AaABAg.AMb4TJCGTT5AMdPA-37jP_","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwbmAo8HK9k41T73p94AaABAg.AMSn1CxHxH-AMXxk7ikZYJ","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwWM6xybMZD8ib7mB14AaABAg.AMKv1nHUgqWAMLo3s3dRBg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwLPBozLCWaoJ5zD8p4AaABAg.AM1pCnFk7liAM2H1bUNjvy","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses