Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Use Claude brotha... Claude Opus 4.6 is basically a high-quality experienced pro…
ytc_UgwTgiThZ…
G
I work in Healthcare IT and I have been saying this for a while, the white-colla…
rdc_jw63c6w
G
Neil lives in a science fiction AI fantasy world, self driving cars will not rea…
ytc_UgyGfKYmw…
G
Facial recognition want work we all have ppl that look similar to others and of …
ytc_UgyAsXKeh…
G
Love is God's gift to humanity and living creatures to be shared through experie…
ytr_UgxbIuMgt…
G
C ai is not what I'm worried about, I'm worried about my hi waifu chats getting …
ytc_UgxQ9iVtr…
G
I generate Lonely Astronauts in AI and make Lonely Astronaut videos. Can I be a …
ytc_UgwSdE_gh…
G
Officer_Stork_UTTP Respectfully, you are objectively wrong. Speaking as someone …
ytr_UgwhDUfe9…
Comment
@KevinGulling It depends... It can do very complex math since it has a lot of training on mathematical concepts, but it can fail at properly carrying digits, similar to how it will mess up at identifiers or get confused about version consistency if you tell it to program something for you in one shot. The difference is that you can take that code, try to compile it, and then see exactly why it's wrong, which means you can bring it back to the AI with those results or let it do confirmation itself, like if you give it tools to confirm its results (like Python/REPL). This is why tool calling is more prevalent now. If you've tried telling an AI model to do something long-form or complicated like decoding from base64 or extracting text from a PDF, it will use tools automatically; but if it didn't have those tools, which it didn't for a long time, then yeah, it will be terrible at it and confidently provide/hallucinate wrong answers even for basic stuff because it had no symbolic grounding.
youtube
AI Governance
2026-03-17T13:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgwWyW3vQg2x9xIptB54AaABAg.AURk1-1DAAIAUSjwE5WdQX","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwzGmtADaJEY6k8qmd4AaABAg.AURi2sb4-VbAUTdup9Exgj","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwzGmtADaJEY6k8qmd4AaABAg.AURi2sb4-VbAUZ_GgE0DjN","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx9UBQQH62TXoM3hoV4AaABAg.AURhjNEiVbOAURn4xYUs4U","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzaPv4Qlg_zxb4Bwdt4AaABAg.AURhQgzcup7AUSijQTkShd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxWkOCjBPsxNPNil3p4AaABAg.AUReWdyptusAUS1cAPNH29","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxWkOCjBPsxNPNil3p4AaABAg.AUReWdyptusAUS3WKb34Wk","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugx0ioAUFHKUh2EkHf14AaABAg.AURdsXd4PoVAUV7_fjOuWH","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"sadness"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyEYKV9ah0Y7WJ3eiZ4AaABAg.AURdVyQ5hJRAURg5zNhFoK","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxJtANl7XWDUrYvchp4AaABAg.AURc-4KMPnUAURi0J1hB_2","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]