Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Yup a.i is the beast of prophecy and the Google chip and neurolink are the marks…
ytc_UgzZ96Rzz…
G
The hammer in my room:
The battle axe in my collection:
My faith in God Almigh…
ytc_UgyTbqKsB…
G
Fake. Right before her face is removed you can see lights reflecting in her eyes…
ytc_Ugy5ggD-O…
G
Fun fact,, Sam Altman I believe,,, recently said being polite to your AI is cost…
ytc_Ugw0z7Ghj…
G
There's two main AI that's a threat to humans. The first is simply one built by …
ytc_UgymsX6PV…
G
If it's truth, that's great. But mind sharing what kind of work AI doing for you…
ytr_Ugz7sblDW…
G
You could change this to "the people on this sub are most likely unemployed new …
rdc_moy26b3
G
self-driving cars are still programmed and you can have discrete programming for…
ytr_UgiJaxBMl…
Comment
@@SetaroDeglet-Noor Yes. But GPT-4 isn't an existential threat. It is not AGI.
AGI poses existential threat.
That's what Bengio and Tegmark are arguing for, not that GPT-4 poses existential threat.
GPT-4 poses risks, but they are not existential. I think Melanie can't think of existential threats of AI, because she is only considering current AIs, like GPT-4, so let's not do that. We need to consider future AI, AGI, which will indeed be able to do things that we cannot prevent, including things that might go against our goals, if they are misaligned, and in those cases, they could cause our extinction.
I'm a bit disappointed that they didn't talk about instrumental convergence explicitly, but they just kind of mentioned it vaguely, without focusing on it much. I wish someone like Yudkowsky or Robert Miles could have been there, to provide more concrete technical examples and explanations.
youtube
AI Governance
2023-06-26T00:3…
♥ 8
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_Ugx_TYMnuaoDy8oOl2Z4AaABAg.9rP-tW7VcEz9rTDYYTzOwx","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzILEF6c80rviWuew14AaABAg.9rOfRNYsrK_9rPr9ZZo3Gx","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzvAE9c82jICQGq7754AaABAg.9rOd7tgv5fY9rPIqd6kVCb","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzvAE9c82jICQGq7754AaABAg.9rOd7tgv5fY9rPllc8WblS","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwHyJCTsfpVlfgY4id4AaABAg.9rOUtK6eOPP9rOmEEPdeXC","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwHyJCTsfpVlfgY4id4AaABAg.9rOUtK6eOPP9rPFptFVcrQ","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwHyJCTsfpVlfgY4id4AaABAg.9rOUtK6eOPP9rPrGXr5C7N","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw_vDk_1yjEcZa0Su14AaABAg.9rOTUtSVYLV9rOmdhjqwjF","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugw_vDk_1yjEcZa0Su14AaABAg.9rOTUtSVYLV9sGpoflejiH","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxsrxsaoh_cpFVOt0J4AaABAg.9rOMdAZj3ax9rOhT20qZ81","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]