Raw LLM Responses

@thewannabecritic7490 You're acting like typing a prompt once and getting art is how it actually works. Professional AI artists spend hours refining prompts, understanding how different models behave, combining techniques, and post processing results. Saying "anyone can type" is like saying "anyone can hold a paintbrush" but we both know there's skill in knowing what to paint and how. You dismiss the paint bucket comparison but completely ignore that modern digital art uses auto smoothing, perspective correction, symmetry tools, texture generators and loads of automated features that would've been called "cheating" decades ago. Where do you draw the line? On the legal stuff, yeah corporate influence exists but you're basically saying every judge is either corrupt or clueless. Courts have consistently ruled that human creativity and intent matter more than the tools used. This applied to photography, digital art, and now AI. Your claim about AI being useless is just wrong though. AI has helped with protein folding research, weather prediction, medical imaging, drug discovery. The cancer detection thing varies by study but some AI systems have actually outperformed doctors in specific diagnostic tasks. About cameras vs AI, artistic photography isn't about "evidence" or "footage" it's about composition, lighting, timing, vision. Same creative decisions happen with AI through prompt crafting, parameter tweaking, and curating results. Calling everything "slop" ignores examples of genuinely thoughtful AI artwork that required real creative input and decision making. This same "not real art" debate happened with photography, digital painting, even oil paints at one point.