Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G @genericname2747 ok. but again, if someone is just trying to bring their imagina… ytr_UgyDeS9q-… G Automation always impacts jobs, always will, always has. Typesetting is (almost… rdc_glhz0dl G And he probably has dedicated, motivated parents, routines he’s been properly tr… ytc_UgzML979v… G Dear Professor, Your lecture raises fundamental questions, but there's an asp… ytc_Ugyrv371H… G Sounds like the people who made these decisions believed the AI was perfect. F… ytc_Ugxlv_6e2… G This video will age like 🍰, in a decade, AI will replay a huge amount of trivial… ytc_UgxnnaqDs… G there robots dude you can obviously see the texture of the robot compare to the … ytc_UgyiR0aGu… G This is not progress. Seriously, you call automation going the exact opposite wa… ytr_UgzrkbXrr…

Comment

Asimov did not invent the idea of robots. The word was coined by Karel Capek and the concept actually predates even Capek. For that matter, even Asimov's robotics magnum opus I, Robot borrows its title from Eando Binder's first Adam Link story. What Asimov invented was the Three Laws of Robotics, which postulates the existence of the inherently "safe" robot. However, Asimov was also a closet socialist and his final judgment on the future of robotics was that surrendering our freedoms to the perfectly rational governance of sentient robots would be the most ethical thing humans could do. However, even Asimov had his doubts, and the irony in his viewpoint can be seen in last story of I, Robot. In The Evitable Conflict, the character Stephen Byerley expresses his worries to Susan Calvin that humanity had surrendered control of its future to the Machines, giant positronic computers able to manage and control entire civilizations. Well, readers know from the previous story (Evidence) that Byerley himself was a robot masquerading as a human. Apparently even a robot following the Three Laws doesn't think this is such a good idea.

youtube 2013-12-09T07:1… ♥ 2

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	unclear
Policy	unclear
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgivAleInBOkjHgCoAEC.7-H0Z7-JFa27-S3RkFhTNQ","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgivAleInBOkjHgCoAEC.7-H0Z7-JFa27-TY_daaHie","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgguY3yjGM6lmngCoAEC.7-H0Z7-9JmA7-HcdMvXtJx","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgguY3yjGM6lmngCoAEC.7-H0Z7-9JmA7-Hdh5Qu4VO","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgjvKr1TIqjam3gCoAEC.7-H0Z7-RYUF7-NjSodPYy6","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgweZmRxDLPdgXkvdkl4AaABAg.AFn4IhvJhiqAFneoe0REQK","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgweZmRxDLPdgXkvdkl4AaABAg.AFn4IhvJhiqAFoBewpe124","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzFLjc8rPLHOp0uofB4AaABAg.AFn2y23x568ATbpwSmlGMe","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyCWoArdjvAl6gi1td4AaABAg.AFn0keZ8wAaAFo2NuwfN2u","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwrmHAHcekTdE9UdJt4AaABAg.AFmzuXuKbKoAFn0D7GkyZY","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]

Raw LLM Responses