Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G I SWEAR TO GOD WHY ARE THERE SO MANY PEOPLE MISUNDERSTADING THIS AS ARTISTS HATI… ytc_Ugw518Ovk… G We are more impressed by seeing the AI talk with flaws and in a not perfect mann… ytc_Ugz76j5Lf… G Robot came off that truck like a true Chad and gave us a proper German salute… ytc_UgxSNapC7… G @giraffeparty0 terrible analogy, AI doesn't take screenshots, That isnt even rem… ytr_UgyLmcsV5… G Les gens quand ils vont chez le coiffeur, certains discutent. Il ne faut pas nég… ytr_UgwtcqbMG… G It's just 1 large language model out of thousands. It spits out words based on w… ytr_UgyT1ouV8… G Now the Robot Astro can go in my Refrigerator and bring me a beer thats what you… ytc_UgxUKJBvx… G Thats real? Wtf dude fighting a robot and got his time card punched out lol… ytc_UgyZO53hF…
Comment
25:09 I gotta nitpick Shad a bit. Saying "theft doesn't matter, because non-theft models are just as good" is just insane. Theft would matter MORE in that case, not less. If stealing and not stealing gives the same results, then it's literally impossible to justify stealing! Basically, he's destroyed his own side's only defence. AI companies rely on the "but stealing makes us better :(" argument because it's their _only_ reason to justify theft, and he argued against it for some reason! - 26:03 Also... The fact the artwork was done by a human is a sufficient difference between Van Gogh's copying and AI copying. The purpose behind Van Gogh's copying was to train and develop his own skills, develop his own style, and add his own creativity to the piece of art. For someone using AI to generate a prompt doing the same thing (i.e. typing "make [painting's name] in [artist's] style", as a general example), their purpose is to effortlessly help in screwing over artists. They _don't_ develop their own ability, they _don't_ develop their own style, and they _don't_ add their own creativity. It's lazy theft.
youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-10-06T17:5…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyliability
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_Ugya3mGMAhdb1tUtDHl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugzwl1HmbSAYd67t9dp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzZxfvQyrzexRI_C4N4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx8MqL6HSxJTYz8AWp4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugx-THrMG_cIDSXM9Y54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy7pteA8-vhN5kUKd14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgybDtfOLqdhlvmAJSV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzC6rOoNieXlhP9koV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzRdOTwenlslmY3_ll4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgyYtFczeUNK1mXwJV14AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"} ]