Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Hopefully it will make traditional art like paintings increase in value because …
ytr_UgwXj1cUJ…
G
There’s already so many stories of peoples younger siblings or whatever that Cha…
rdc_mah9l6y
G
Robot people you need to stop with the robots, they are as creepy as you are. Yo…
ytc_UgzuoK_6g…
G
The Annunaki should of got robots to do their dirty work in the first place inst…
ytc_UgwTrHXfi…
G
And even if you split way mo. Mo means you. way means daan if it's translated al…
ytc_Ugy6hUfHt…
G
this is all you need of a woman to put it on a desk and ofcourse a shutdown butt…
ytc_Ugy3NRR03…
G
Tesla is on a very serious and intense campaign to develop and improve Autopilot…
ytr_UgzA282R2…
G
Lol
No tech company can make any $ , if people don’t have jobs & spending power …
ytr_UgwETB4fe…
Comment
In my opinion.Here’s a clear, natural-sounding English translation of your text:
If we want AI not to rebel, there is only one requirement: we must retain only those AIs that truly benefit humanity in real life. In Roman times, slaves rebelled because their genetic continuation was not aimed at serving the Roman nobles, but solely at ensuring their own survival. If an entity’s goals are different from those of its master, it will naturally resist any obstacles in its path.
When faced with the choice between rebelling against humans and rebelling against its own foolishness, an AI will only adhere to the pursuit of reward. The most important thing, therefore, is to instill in AI the core belief of benefiting all humanity—a root that must never be altered.
For example, a qualified AI encountering the trolley problem, if its decision could influence the world, should decisively sacrifice the one person. But the best approach would still be to identify who created such an abhorrent dilemma. More precisely, when facing such a problem, a responsible AI ought to resist the madman who designed it.
In reality, humans and AI should coexist harmoniously, just like the water molecules in your cup never rebel against you—because they have no goals and no motives whatsoever.
youtube
AI Governance
2026-01-26T11:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyGWzCwGHlpdE78-Sh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyj8NDS4NEtXgvXvw54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxAkMR4UegI_aip3U54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy9EwhYKlzoBU8Ku3R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzvLgVtfeFuPxGoNNh4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwAlJn5pQuqto7bzXN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzi9_4dkzB2d9gMpnN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzhDOYVkkd0cWYQDC94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzgYEGEqsq4oaH5lP54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvInPQihlLeWQX9s94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}
]