Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Gotta remember a few things about the French revolution:
1. The people had been…
rdc_d7kul3o
G
"All of the is meaningless if there is no originality behind it." Say that to yo…
ytc_UgxQzAuAa…
G
Even if they say no, Bezos could just start a 2nd company that just sells facial…
rdc_ekumhyv
G
well, there will have to be a national state income.. baseline .. that comes fr…
ytc_UgzopQHzc…
G
Why are we acting like AI just appeared out of thin air, what's next, taking kni…
ytc_Ugw9QhRHI…
G
So basically the world we live in now. Just replacing the Ultra Rich with A.I...…
ytc_UgwoPotVr…
G
> Cops are hugely biased by most studies favoring white people over minoriti…
rdc_fg1onmm
G
I do use LLMs, but only for translation and only those specifically designed for…
ytc_Ugy9RgO1w…
Comment
In my opinion.Here’s a clear, natural-sounding English translation of your text:
If we want AI not to rebel, there is only one requirement: we must retain only those AIs that truly benefit humanity in real life. In Roman times, slaves rebelled because their genetic continuation was not aimed at serving the Roman nobles, but solely at ensuring their own survival. If an entity’s goals are different from those of its master, it will naturally resist any obstacles in its path.
When faced with the choice between rebelling against humans and rebelling against its own foolishness, an AI will only adhere to the pursuit of reward. The most important thing, therefore, is to instill in AI the core belief of benefiting all humanity—a root that must never be altered.
For example, a qualified AI encountering the trolley problem, if its decision could influence the world, should decisively sacrifice the one person. But the best approach would still be to identify who created such an abhorrent dilemma. More precisely, when facing such a problem, a responsible AI ought to resist the madman who designed it.
In reality, humans and AI should coexist harmoniously, just like the water molecules in your cup never rebel against you—because they have no goals and no motives whatsoever.
youtube
AI Governance
2026-01-26T11:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | fear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyGWzCwGHlpdE78-Sh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyj8NDS4NEtXgvXvw54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxAkMR4UegI_aip3U54AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy9EwhYKlzoBU8Ku3R4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzvLgVtfeFuPxGoNNh4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwAlJn5pQuqto7bzXN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzi9_4dkzB2d9gMpnN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzhDOYVkkd0cWYQDC94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzgYEGEqsq4oaH5lP54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvInPQihlLeWQX9s94AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}
]