Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Honestly this is what ai art should be used for. Create an image and then redraw…
ytc_UgxQuLVPF…
G
I think you are so so very wrong about this
The vast majority of legal work is …
rdc_fcrztz1
G
I got to say this now, Character ai sucks the bottom of the barrel. AFTER a smal…
ytc_UgxXLOjC6…
G
**You’re not wrong that LLMs are trained to predict the next word, and don’t hav…
rdc_mxoe1av
G
Oh, I didn't know this was a thing. This is awesome! I think AI could have some …
ytc_Ugy-L9P4B…
G
And the questions are to good to be real ? I don’t think Senator’s know anythin…
ytr_UgwBE7LBi…
G
Yeah, We're like the jews only we're poor, We're the black people of Europe, We …
rdc_clv6nui
G
Oh absolutely this. "Good looking" AI images just fail to impress me on a fundam…
ytc_UgzJA-pAK…
Comment
There is at least one overlap of muscles and office work and one of those areas is Time-and-motion assessment.
We all know that it takes a finite amount of time to carry out a task, but some of us may not realise that how long it takes is of great importance to many companies.
A fencing firm needs to have an educated idea of how long to install certain types of fences in order to make a quote for their customers.
An auto repair firm is even more precise! Every task has a listed time to do; how long to change the nearside bulb in a c-reg classic mini will be different to a modern mazda, for instance.
But what if a computer was given control over employee performance?
Would it be sympathetic to times taking longer but for genuinely good reasons?
It's a smaller point in the grand scheme of things, I know, but this demonstrates that if AI were to take a bigger element of control, there would need to be a way to "argue" a point or allowances made for justified changes that require an AI judgement to be reviewed.
youtube
Cross-Cultural
2026-03-02T15:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxegjOB7AnIgd6vZrh4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw04sY0AGXpr2gL-1x4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwCMuFHxnefT72G4EN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw3wNjBstTrF2Z-WaZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwLdz6zJPrMl45H8sp4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz7elvi1KW2JHFu71d4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzu7xeyjNuO5qKLerh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgygA8za1ZMnNiVOthJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyleabVHhJBd1hfjsx4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzrTqrPtUF4PeCovxl4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"resignation"}
]