Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G It’s not going to upend the field or anything in America besides the most brain … rdc_ku7gzcj G @MendogologyIt's easy to understand what I mean by context, but I mean not cond… ytr_UgylIB51W… G I mean, Mark Zuckerburg is basically a robot at this point. Either that or a liz… ytc_Ugwni4kKi… G I have ChatGPT this is probably faked since I asked if u save 5 ppl and that thi… ytc_UgxeWdKqJ… G The biggest joke is that we live in an automated system that started 13.8 billio… ytr_Ugw4zY8jx… G its slow, still struggles with percise people pick up location, no real verbal i… ytc_UgzJ6a61g… G I keep seeing people panic over ChatGPT—calling it dangerous, stupid, or compari… ytc_UgyE6nC3c… G When ai image generation was becoming a bigger thing, I had a belief (or maybe i… ytc_UgwEHW_z6…

Comment

AI companies should have the right to buy a copy of each book and do what they want with it. If a user uses AI to write a novel for income using AI’s capacities, they should know they could be pursued—as in any other case of copyright infringement. AI doesn’t care about copyright—it can shift from one writing style to another in a glimpse. That’s an amazing capacity, and it’s theirs. We shouldn’t limit that just to protect authors’ income. No author can write good books without having first read great ones. AI does the same, with a few differences of course—it’s not incarnated in a human body—but from that perspective, what it produces is even more astonishing. Cutting off AI from novels would be like cutting it off from science, just to protect some researchers’ jobs. But researchers use AI to do better science. Authors can do the same—write even better books than before, better than what a beginner could do using AI. One last point: all the books AI has read can help with its alignment. We should not deprive it of this treasure of human thought just to keep it a technical tool. For humanity, AI could be a kind of enlightenment—just like the printing press was in the past. Knowledge is not made for intellectual property. There is no thinker who ever learned everything they speak of entirely by themselves.

youtube 2025-07-19T18:1… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	user
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugzk5_YKBhSAS94MFBR4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxl1RkuB14w4SoJH_V4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwjnrDpTG5CVgvtacB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQPasxQWv-WKIoacZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyEJaagmU0av1eIv594AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzoj3_A_R_xnsTOp9d4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgybuA7WhscaNRJpROx4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy2JsnNAK9csYDc3at4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwU9766-vTtwBKbztB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy8EoyK8CTp2WZX7TR4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}
]

Raw LLM Responses