Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I mean if you consider psychological weapons the internet should be regulated in…
ytc_Ugw6WSIvl…
G
Man, AI sucks. I work in 3D animation/vfx industry and the genertative AI techno…
ytc_UgyoxvhE2…
G
We are at the trough of disillusionment, yeah its too soon, AI needs more testin…
ytc_UgzEUkl2f…
G
This just happened in Texas with a Tesla robot...
Beat up engineer 😂...
Don't kn…
ytc_UgzcqtetI…
G
They will fail. LLMs are not capable of the things you're worrying about. AI doe…
ytr_Ugxjf4R20…
G
Generally good reporting. My only cringe moment is when lumping AlphaFold toget…
ytc_Ugx5FjvL2…
G
@ most intricate patterns actually. Ai kinda sucks at creating figures and compl…
ytr_Ugyy6WGq2…
G
The irony is they want AI concept art, then they want AI 3D models, you make it,…
ytc_UgyCPTgD_…
Comment
10:10 “I have a feeling” that sentence will be brought up in the lawsuit 😅
He acknowledged the possibility of it being wrong and then based his next action off a “feeling”. Not evidence.
The AI detection is not evidence. It is not admissible in court because it cannot prove beyond reasonable doubt that they are the same person. Error is rooted in these systems and although they can appear to be correct 99% of the time with more simple tasks. As things get complex there’s more nodes and more room for error. Hence why we can see stuff like this.
This AI integration is “cool” and CAN be extremely helpful for the public but it is on us to remain ethical with our use but also our interpretation of what the AI is presenting to us.
AI isn’t inherently bad or malicious. It becomes that way because of the user— this is a perfect example. The officer took what the AI is presented and did not conduct any critical thinking, he took no extra avenues to determine who this man is or verify with someone else. It’s not the AI pushing this officer to violate this man’s rights. The AI presented them with a response and they interpreted it as the undeniable truth without investigation.
youtube
2025-12-14T18:5…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_Ugw2arE4OtZwui6sFQh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzHmCSKBCvSyr08K2Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzCYg0pLrJh0nGu3MN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzNDZc81NkYt77cOWZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwm1xcJ5n978ukliVN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzlRp1kerzehHBHg_54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzUKGDbDVEQAPxBq354AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwms3SSE51vpPxb9q54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw3udE6tWanbf6gwzp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwQ3s4s2fDAkvUZ7QF4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]