Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G Each time i interact with AI is like talking to a 5 y.o. Stupid and needs correc… ytc_UgzXjd5at… G Detroit become human did tell us this was our future. Only thing thats missing i… ytc_UgxpPpQTE… G Half of the AI bros complaining and getting mad aren't even AI bros. They're eit… ytc_UgyceSGMg… G For now. However the scenario that more and more cognitive jobs will be elimin… rdc_jpuhnw5 G Not a cscareer response, but moreso an in general response. The reason to not w… rdc_kyzghxj G Yes Ai is dangerous but not forget they have no any life they are not made up of… ytc_UgzwlHihT… G Funniest thing about image generation is that AI models can't learn on data that… ytc_UgweUb_qD… G That is mostly true but you can constrain the dialogue and back it into a corner… ytr_UgwX7jVxw…

Comment

The problem with this hypothesis is surely that you run into limits of consumption. Even the uber rich eventually reach a point they aren't going to consume much more, especially in specific industries. A rich person can only eat so much food, has only so many hours in the day to be entertained and only has so many nights to spend in hotels and additional properties. If you're a company selling toilet paper, you probably aren't going to make ever increasing revenue selling ever more fancy toilet paper to a consistent number of butts. To stick to the food example - as it stands, rich people _do_ spend more per month on food (e.g. they eat more organic food, whole foods...etc.) but as a % of their income, food expenses are much lower than lower-income individuals (especially when you exclude eating-out, where you're saying for service and experience more than actual food itself). If you're a food company who has automated your supply chain and backend staff, and now wants to grow revenues, you're likely to lose out more due to the masses being cheapskates than benefit due to selling the rich fancy produce.

youtube AI Harm Incident 2024-07-29T13:4… ♥ 22

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	none
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgyRqpy1f7-b_HNyM_B4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwAUby9wbWUyR03Cxx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyyQkBOObiJDy7_daF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxzqsLNrIUifTcdc5Z4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyQMsHdiQYcDiE2Qi94AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzl9WjgaC-djloZlNZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7R4nZtCuUJ-aPXRx4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw9eiRIv3gaLNqA-5R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXa8WTwFpdqnN5mr14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz7cX8rMxYfv8jIvrJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]

Raw LLM Responses