Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Comment
"At the expense of anything I want everything"~ In this case, it refers to developing AI to replace human art. "If it's a million-dollar technology, then it's for billion-dollar people to make trillions." What about jobs? What about the job crisis that this technology is causing right from the beginning? What about the ethical use of this revolutionary technology? Why aren't we asking our policymakers—who claim to represent us, the common folk—to make rules and regulations on this sci-fi stuff? What about the love of creating an art piece and the joy of learning about it? These AI models are trained on millions of artists' works without any permission, and they blatantly say, "It's based on your work to replace you because you're a cost burden for my enterprise. And we're sorry to use your data without your permission because we want more and more profit, depriving billions of people of their livelihoods." Did artists allow them to train their AI on their artistic work to replace them tomorrow? What kind of logic is this? Artists used to cut film reels in the past, and now they're using software, which is a workflow change—not making a whole film with just some AI prompting! FYI, that particular editing software wasn't made based on the years of work, sweat, and experience of millions of artists. It's like saying the camera took all the oil painters' jobs. Cameras, as a technology, weren't made based on or dependent on oil painters or any artist. A calculator doesn’t depend on a math teacher’s teaching data. It also doesn’t function like today’s AI does—that’s why they are tools. But AI is not a tool right now; it has become a slot machine built on stolen data from years of artists’ hard work. And it will discourage people from pursuing art as a career, especially any form of visual art. I wonder—if people stop pursuing art and creating their unique styles, what will be left to steal and feed into your slot machine? There's a difference between independent technology and a slot machine (AI). I'm a 3D animator and painter. I learned and honed my skills and gathered years of experience in this creative, artistic world. But, as always, it seems some money-craving corporate vultures are feeding their technology by scouring the whole internet and stealing my data and the data of millions of others without permission or their interest in mind. They're fooling people by saying that it'll make life easier and that they can do more creative tasks while doing the mundane, repetitive technical tasks done by AI, while the reality is just the 180-degree opposite. People are thrilled, thinking they don't need to learn or invest anything to get what they want with this tech, as if these vultures are pouring billions into this tech to make ordinary people into something big without having any productive quality or making a living. For example, "to make everyone a movie director." If you think that hiring a professional is a more hazardous burden than paying less for a 24/7/365 service to make your job easy, then, my friend, what makes you think your job couldn't be replaced by the same technology, making your enterprise worthless tomorrow? Countless fields need this revolutionary technology's advancements, such as pharmaceuticals, research on incurable diseases, space, and rocket science, solving global warming, fighting against pollution, the defense sector, population crisis, disaster management, and preservation of endangered species. But no, what we're aiming for is to destroy art. "I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art, animation, and painting, not for AI to do my art and painting so that I can do my laundry and dishes." In the name of creativity, what is left to create then? I ask you this: would you like to live in such a world where your kids aren't going to learn to draw, sing, dance, play outside, or learn social skills in building connections with real human beings? What kind of world would that be? "We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried, and most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita: 'Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.'" ~ J. Robert Oppenheimer It was a nuclear moment for governments back then, and now it's the same kind of nuclear moment for us, the small folk.
youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-04-06T07:5… ♥ 1
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningconsequentialist
Policyregulate
Emotionoutrage
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytc_Ugzgc0oDhl4GlMFP7YJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugzp6FNWPvlA9jpvz594AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxAEqSIfzB3GXnYLUR4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_UgxZCNR3yvWwhO5x0fN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_UgzuWpmxS8mGKAU7Aa14AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugxk-vawS7smBiUkA2p4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugyy8dl2PWOlYnkb5RR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugy3mgGepG9CyeXa3Dp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugwy-638uGa9emk02Rl4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytc_Ugw-n3TlRnZjB95Ef3t4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"} ]