Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
People forget these ai are impersonating objective perspectives of both parties…
ytc_Ugw8kN0LM…
G
I mean, look. I’ve masturbated to the thought of some of my coworkers. If dude d…
ytc_UgyKfB7Pj…
G
Ai is good, China is making daring AI’s that USA will not make, such as sex part…
ytc_UgxQFIArK…
G
"Mark my words, AI is far more dangerous than nukes"
…
ytc_UgyH-Rzr7…
G
LIAR! HES LYING GUYS! HES LYING! CHAT GPT, AI, CANT CODE SHIT! IVE BEEN TR…
ytc_UgyO66Ex1…
G
Why is it always the same prompt whenever people make fun of ai prompters 😭😭😭
I…
ytc_UgxQk91W-…
G
Would an airline manufacturer be allowed to test and develop their aircraft and …
ytc_Ugwb12XEG…
G
Hes just trying to marry it. Its literally just code, and if you ask the AI to r…
ytc_UgyLj-ouE…
Comment
I haven’t watched the video yet, but as an early AI programmer dating back to the early 90s, I will say with 1000% certainty that AI will not destroy humanity, if humanity doesn’t trust it too much for tasks which requires sentience.
Here’s why, no matter what anybody tells you, AI cannot create anything, it’s only capable of doing what someone programmed it to be able to do.
Example, put two babies in a crib. On their own, they will learn to communicate and survive together.
Put two computers next to each other without any programming in them, forever they will sit there and do nothing.
There’s your proof.
EDIT AFTER WATCHING THE VIDEO: none of those AI models would’ve compromised human safety if the end goal included not to endanger humans or commit what are considered to be immoral acts.
What that means is, all of those scenarios were included in sub categories, not as a main line and goal.
So again, AI is no threat so long as the goals that are programmed into it include not harming human beings, or destroying the ecology, etc…
youtube
AI Governance
2025-08-26T16:2…
♥ 7
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | user |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T19:39:26.816318 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzZulSU8a4S5Q6HnI54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAxDcMebRzoUGITKB4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyrDzKcwd9_Rp3cePN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxun3SgG5T-M7mA8MZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzQjmuD0xdj1kWe05R4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"}
]