Raw LLM Responses

I've been using AI for about a year and a half. First of all, as a tool, the way I use it at least , the term AI is a problem. If one uses it by supplying a prompt and then wait, that is not for actual artists. Thats ultimately for lazy people. Most people ARE lazy. Most art made before AI is unoriginal and never had any intention of producing original work. The way I use AI requires every bit as much work as I've ever done . First of all it requires MY fully completed drawings, paintings, pastels etc. Stage two requires uploading my completed work into the program. Then I play with a series of prompts, sliders, textures, over and over again for hours and sometimes days. Its actually not much different than any other digital program unless you are intrinsically a fraud/thief. There is absolutely no way my AI program could produce what I've produced with it without MY seed drawing. My seed drawings are the map, in a sense. I recommend if you consider your self an artist with an oeuvre and trajectory of vision that is your own. Then try it. At the end of the day there will still be unoriginal copy cat artists just as before. I worked in Hollywood, thats ALL they do out there is mimic whats in fashion. Try it. Work it. If you are interested in creating you can create with AI. If you were never an outlier/artist then you might want to look in the mirror. You may be projecting. AI , like any other program needs to get the S***T kicked out of violently until it obeys my vision and trajectory. Just like 3D digital programs. I've seen very little original 3D animations. Most is nauseatingly dull, just like most of Hollywood. Photoshop, Illustrator, same thing. My only advice is when one critiques an agnostic program make sure you're not just projecting.