Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@worldsmostretardedperson whatever you say about human intelligence could be rig…
ytr_UgxE5y7sM…
G
> I'd even bet artists would be less opposed to AI art if it didn't actively…
rdc_nclkxnz
G
@jensenraylight8011 Have you even used AI to make stuff? I feel like there's a l…
ytr_UgwCeVRUI…
G
Perhaps the most irritating part of AI image generation is how these image have …
ytc_UgwGPcbZK…
G
I sincerely doubt that robots will evolve feelings but will instead develop the …
ytc_Ugh0heeLS…
G
Artists our commander has given us are mission this is no longer an opinion of g…
ytc_UgzcpDxKs…
G
They aren’t using the correct measurement systems, imho 🤷♀️ I worked in video s…
ytc_Ugy4HRAiH…
G
Software engineer here who specialised in AI back in college... I refuse to refe…
ytc_UgwFsxKIe…
Comment
This is an "interesting" take, considering that we have now seen the emails from Elon Musk to Sam Altman where he states that OpenAI has a "0" (not 1) percent chance of competing against other big AI players unless Elon is the one in charge of OpenAI, and only under a proposed absorption by Tesla. If Elon were so concerned about continuing OpenAI's non-profit structure only, he wouldn't have taken his toys (money) and run home when they realized that without more funding they would never be able to reach the required compute to realize AGI in the first place, nor would he have proposed that OpenAI fall under control of the for-profit company named Tesla. Now that Elon realizes he made a big mistake by leaving OpenAI, he is trying to change the narrative, knowing full well that all the "Elon lovers" will help sway the court of opinion on a frivolous law suit filed by Elon in an obvious attempt to do nothing more than slow down Sam Altman's success. Elon's ego is the only problem on display here.
youtube
AI Governance
2024-03-24T05:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwfUsDxqKJ_nM1HMg14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwcc3VbT_36W2syJFZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAnZsB-gyLAB9DlYh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwrYSsxf7qgcQvsCbp4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxzGTmGDM1KSuKWTAN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxk2YMcywR9hDbSV3N4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzXMstqwGwcHA9L1Y94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxyY3JBPbsnV2wvDOB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvFu03dQD62lgiVs14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyyH7QBty0skFFeXF94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]