Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The argument in “ai is accessible” calls it an “exploration of art” when they ar…
ytc_UgxJzoMdg…
G
They are treating AI like a new technology that's no difference from the ones in…
ytr_UgyptKh4c…
G
We’re arguing semantics with this debate. If someone wants to call the AI the ar…
ytr_Ugxm2w06R…
G
@thewannabecritic7490 Gosh - I wonder how artists ever made a living before the …
ytr_Ugwwn7KHM…
G
Thinking about this at about 9:41
[doubt I'll get a response but putting it out …
ytc_UgyNBAR_q…
G
luckily AI/math will keep getting better and better, and it has already been ver…
ytc_UgwgaYq3V…
G
en même temps, l'exemple final a un salaire de 2x celui de son pays.
l'arnaque e…
ytr_UgyUk5xwO…
G
You are witnessing the end of mankind. It starts small but like a snowball rolli…
ytc_UgzlL2HoB…
Comment
This is an "interesting" take, considering that we have now seen the emails from Elon Musk to Sam Altman where he states that OpenAI has a "0" (not 1) percent chance of competing against other big AI players unless Elon is the one in charge of OpenAI, and only under a proposed absorption by Tesla. If Elon were so concerned about continuing OpenAI's non-profit structure only, he wouldn't have taken his toys (money) and run home when they realized that without more funding they would never be able to reach the required compute to realize AGI in the first place, nor would he have proposed that OpenAI fall under control of the for-profit company named Tesla. Now that Elon realizes he made a big mistake by leaving OpenAI, he is trying to change the narrative, knowing full well that all the "Elon lovers" will help sway the court of opinion on a frivolous law suit filed by Elon in an obvious attempt to do nothing more than slow down Sam Altman's success. Elon's ego is the only problem on display here.
youtube
AI Governance
2024-03-24T05:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | company |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwfUsDxqKJ_nM1HMg14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwcc3VbT_36W2syJFZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzAnZsB-gyLAB9DlYh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwrYSsxf7qgcQvsCbp4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxzGTmGDM1KSuKWTAN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxk2YMcywR9hDbSV3N4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzXMstqwGwcHA9L1Y94AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxyY3JBPbsnV2wvDOB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvFu03dQD62lgiVs14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyyH7QBty0skFFeXF94AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"}
]