Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
As long as people love money and they always will no one will be safe from AI. B…
ytc_Ugzsr6-hR…
G
Notice how AI generated 2D animation isn't 2D but 3D with "2D" textures. The way…
ytc_UgwUjM-4C…
G
Yes it can. There have already been instances where AI created artwork has won f…
ytr_UgwNks1JS…
G
When you said what you said about Ai writing what it wrote, all I could say was …
ytc_UgydjrtbZ…
G
I'm not so convinced by the end point being described. All innovation has dramat…
ytc_UgzaZkdNt…
G
Just because you can do something, doesn’t mean you should do it. AI caters to t…
ytc_UgzJFqQWv…
G
The definition of AI is fake so why would anyone want to believe in a phone lapt…
ytc_UgzdK7zLZ…
G
These greedy companies will definitely end our existance. AI is now way too good…
ytc_UgxprPGNe…
Comment
The next big break through in AI won't come from AI but the tools we invent to help us manage it, including governance tools.
Why should a single organisation or institution govern how AI is going to be distributed or consumed by other organisations or institutions?
Part of the problem of having standards is that it is a multi-stakeholder response to a common problem. Having one stakeholder determine what that problem is going to be for all other stakeholders, obviously doesn't scale.
The next big break through has to come from the disruption of our current political systems, so that stakeholders in AI from suppliers through to consumers can determine what the policies or rules are going to be on a case by case basis.
It won't come from a single organisation such as central or local government creating constraints on institutions or organisations even before they have had the chance to define what the problem is.
youtube
2025-04-24T19:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | government |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgylLAQYPGExeBVEObV4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXa0f8hVACxq_DPi54AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx_OGsc_OXgsU_VcrZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9KtkwgLQTisGDdBx4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx7dfTBPbGCAvB5Imd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxukg3rTFn2jL2prRR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyOEXCc60mpTmpwHfh4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgznK_phH1g46YI4uNV4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzPW9-ufMvHQPJwgdx4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzzpyYpfO5fBQVIoSh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]