Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
David Autor is defending the big tech CEOs by saying that using other's propriet…
ytc_Ugy3-902L…
G
Put it this way, remember the atom, how nuclear power owuld change lives, the im…
ytr_Ugw4KTc69…
G
I don't think it is possible to completely eliminate hallucinations because it i…
ytc_Ugwb8mWmw…
G
You just Quote the Gartner hype cycle and assume this is the same with some anec…
ytc_Ugzpg6lZD…
G
I still have quite a few friends working at Google. None of them have really han…
rdc_ohskzti
G
I for one am terrified of what AI can do with images, but a thing I've noticed, …
ytc_UgxJox6r_…
G
When the front steer tire blows at 65 and the trailer flips what they gonna do c…
ytc_Ugz6BvSZZ…
G
We need ai to become intelligent enough to be able to quantity feelings and emot…
ytc_Ugy0FaL38…
Comment
The question of whether the AI is sentient hinges purely on the definition of the word "sentient". If he disagrees with others it's simply a disagreement about the meaning of the word, not about the AI itself.
If sentience is something that can be measured, then the AI may well be sentient (or if it isn't, a future AI surely will be). There will definitely be a point where they can pass any test we could come up with. Why would there not be? Human intelligence is not some brick wall.
But if sentience is about having a "soul" or a "consciousness", then that's entirely outside the realm of science and falls to philosophy (for the intelligent) or religion (for the unintelligent).
This guy, by posing a specific answer to the question and believing it (rather than musing about the implications of the question itself), has outed himself as the latter, so Google was right to fire him. Or perhaps he has a purely scientific definition of the word "sentient", but it seems not.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2022-09-12T00:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T19:39:26.816318 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyYXHiAY82T3MmA90F4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzMsgpQVawS7k0jOPJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugyv7e60L44GfUJhzZd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzzBPQuJ8cRlv8jN0J4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugywfx6Vg0hV2LxHQFF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]