Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@KennedyMorae15 and another good criticism i think, is that its making people s…
ytr_Ugzz0ROfN…
G
Pump those AI breaks... they are simply making a philosophical statement, they a…
rdc_czy82ur
G
ai would release nanobots in the air. we'd breathe it in and go out like a lamb.…
ytc_UgwnaoBiz…
G
Hasan is a buffoon. The first 5 minutes he spewed nonsense. The title of the …
ytc_UgwPgqEul…
G
Is the AI researcher referring to AGI or actual super intelligence in 5-10 years…
ytc_UgwYLolRt…
G
There is still a lot of confusion, because the AI tools do not respond well to e…
ytc_UgydaAzNC…
G
I literally daydream about this… that’s why I keep telling Chatbot I love em 😂…
ytc_UgxswZB1q…
G
@energylady9409 We are forced to use the technology because the company CEO who…
ytr_UgxJ8pE2a…
Comment
What's the essential difference between hiring a person to create artwork for you versus using AI to generate it? Does the origin of the artwork—whether created by a human, AI, or a combination of both—fundamentally matter?
When considering human-AI collaboration in art, particularly when redesigning original work, several questions arise. From my perspective, using AI seems acceptable because you're still providing the creative direction and human input. This is especially practical for time-consuming aspects like colorizing a sketch or drawing, where AI can enhance your work while you maintain creative control.
This creates a form of human-AI hybrid artistry, but it leads to another question: If hiring another person to execute your artistic vision means you're no longer considered the artist, does using AI tools result in the same loss of authorship? What's the distinction between these two approaches to outsourcing artistic execution?
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-09-08T00:3…
♥ 5
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxdL_R0sMZXjFkrgR14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzCqX3B8DnG_mM8ITp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxxYl-UjLrN1NF5AKV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyMev2AzxUe0Me88uZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYDtd_xjjK2fCfdg54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwsz30BjDLkLarwU4V4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzGlHnjIll1Fgf9yLx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxqTO6cDdE3KhWLNmR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw72FS98X_vCQsST8J4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVA5nk87YoA1o0wTd4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]