Raw LLM Responses

The comment section summary for those who want it: - Blue blood is a bad way to put it BECAUSE - Anyone can do art. It all sucks at the beginning for all except maaaaaybe savants. My old art sucked but it only took a year to improve it and I've only been improving since then. There is no blue blood to art, there are only happy accidents that you learn from through labors of love. Watch Bob Ross, he's unironically such a good teacher. - AI exploits people. It lacks intention behind its choices, which makes it unfortunately boring to view as an art historian. - While I don't see this exploitation or technology leaving any time soon, it is you as a consumer who is actively defending the greatest theft seen in art history from a demographic of people known for their "famine/feast" cycles. While artists can make money, a lot barely make a living. Stealing from artists both discourages new artists from trying art (a thing known for mental health benefits due to its hard-earned rewarding pursuit) and current professionals from continuing to create stuff (cause you're kinda stealing their job man.) - Skill is earned. Art is skill because "having a knack" for something alone will never earn a living. - Gate keepers suck. Have fun, spite them and try something new.