Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The only thing Becky actually cares about is her portfolio full of trillion doll…
ytr_UgxBb4l-G…
G
I myself feel more original still and I can use the AI graphics to solve toneing…
ytc_UgxNbPsf3…
G
As a user of chatgpt i honestly think this is fake. The responses are not consis…
ytc_UgySkamBZ…
G
They say this shit now because they know it's not too late to stop AI…
rdc_ogu10xs
G
Global average surface temperatures right now are far lower than they would be o…
rdc_faqluru
G
I'm not making any AI art and I never will, yet I'm certain that I'm unable to e…
ytc_UgzinRwKP…
G
lemme break it down: as humans, we learn EVERYTHING. no one is born to walk righ…
ytc_UgyciHy3r…
G
Contrast with Waze... where the cars are actually autonomous, and in my interact…
ytc_UgxpRgh4I…
Comment
The reason I don't necessarily trust these predictions to be 100% accurate is pretty simple. These predictions suppose that humans will be convinced to allow other humans to be paid well for little to no work, and that humans will allow war to end, among other things. Nothing, not even a hyper-intelligent AI, can use logic to overcome emotionally-based beliefs and ways of thinking.
I still think AI will probably be the end of us, and I think the one thing that will _definitely_ not happen is humans banding together and agreeing to halt all progress. If China is producing one, the US will also. And if the US is, China will also. In fact, a hyper-intelligent AI doesn't even need to be in the works—if the mere possibility exists for one superpower to produce one, the other will build one also. There is, therefore, probably no chance for a mutual halt. Just look at nuclear proliferation. AI is another one of those things. The only major difference being that nukes can't think and reason and convince people that they're actually good for us, or become hyperdominant and unstoppable the way AI can and probably will.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-04-28T20:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | unclear |
| Emotion | resignation |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgwQTphock4pa1zG6RB4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz4AmODNjEP62OF-0d4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGX0hD_OX7bST0swR4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxuhdHd1QZucNNUcUN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxTbK2BNtoftu7n7g94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzB0eF6_byPDepJWOp4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzTAkxxY-VKk1aQs7B4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyWXnr4089gofYWpzJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxTMX9lHvk02t-LzRF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgywN301FenxoFjOeWB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"}
]