Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Employees: Technology is great! AI will take over the jobs we don't want to do s…
ytc_UgwG2oDew…
G
Gary makes a good point about reduced prices increasing demand... if there are s…
ytc_UgzLfXwvl…
G
What makes me angry and pushes me for this not to happen is because it literally…
ytc_UgxOePm02…
G
You will never stop this ,this is the beginning of the end of the human race.…
ytc_Ugx8OYPBU…
G
This is NOT a failure of AI. Its a failure of IT departments NOT understanding w…
ytc_UgzQFA6eh…
G
The first and second clip are both ai. The first one is just so super hyper real…
ytc_UgyGM6mHO…
G
@sethtenrec But a five year old can tell the difference between, wood parton and…
ytr_UgwNR0pu_…
G
References (that I saw)
Mario (Super mushroom)
Overwatch (That mage floating rob…
ytc_UghHX873V…
Comment
Senator Sanders, I really appreciate your concern about AI and automation, and I agree we need to make sure these technologies benefit everyone. That said, I think focusing mostly on the working class misses a bigger picture. AI isn’t just replacing factory or fast-food jobs it’s starting to affect middle-class office jobs, professional work, and even creative fields. Meanwhile, jobs that rely on physical labor or hands-on skills may actually stick around longer than we think.
There’s also a major economic question your speech doesn’t really touch on: if AI replaces a huge chunk of the workforce, who’s going to have the money to buy the things it produces? Without some way to keep people’s income flowing like universal basic income, profit sharing, or something similar mass automation could end up hurting the economy instead of helping it.
The threat of AI is real, but it’s more complicated than just being a “working-class issue.” We need policies that consider the whole workforce and make sure people can still participate in the economy.
youtube
AI Jobs
2025-10-08T03:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | regulate |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxqhHhvLIrij4QjC7x4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxVmmTkPXui6HZNYpB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_UMewRrLLCYhXBWV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy3WGauMU8jShADdad4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyeaFed62-uZhaVqbJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxun4k30lkDtHQB8n14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7RF5T8s_iDk8oZV54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz3ZjgnSvlvKnqT2DF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyD1Ae4TrJ0tyTFlih4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz-DaSCpEipLa9v5EN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}
]