Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G I filed for US patent 3890161A titled DIODE ARRAY in 1973. It was granted in 197… ytc_Ugy6vSx83… G AI literacy is of dire importance right now. We are on the verge of a new fronti… ytr_UgyVf3Lc1… G as a portrait artist the first thing i see is the eyes are not right, the hair i… ytc_Ugw0e1Jg8… G One issue is greed. Some will have tremendous power that own and control the be… ytc_Ugw1y9ImL… G I had never heard of Shadiversity before this video but watching him greasily tr… ytc_Ugy9evB9m… G @laurentiuvladutmanea > From what I found, this was not about making content or… ytr_UgzLxMDzx… G Someone just has to make deepfakes of those lawmakers and tell them that's what'… ytc_Ugy_lmGO1… G Who cares? Like I get it you feel weird but like... what do you expect to happen… rdc_kwbx6fg

Comment

14:06 I'd actually give a different response here. As bad an artist as Jackson Pollick is, at least he's an artist. The algorithm that made the fantasy landscape (and the fake Pollick) isn't, by definition an artist. Hence the works of Pollick, by default definition, has more artistic value than anything the AI spits out. The issue is the dude in the video tried to do a gotcha by mixing up the question. He asked which had more artistic value, and then showed a known bad artist while showing a pretty looking landscape generated by AI. If he had asked which is better looking, he might've gotten more artists saying that the AI landscape was prettier, it he didn't. He asked a bunch of artists which had more value, and so they chose the one they thought had at least been made by a human. Then he changed the question with his gotcha by saying "see it was actually AI and you couldn't tell". The thing is, those artists probably answered on principle. They didn't say they LIKED Polluck's supposed piece, they just assumed that it was one of his works (again because his works are so shit) that even an AI recreation was unidentifiable, and so just chose the one they thought was made by a human.

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2025-12-02T02:4… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	ai_itself
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_Ugyq4_e66aT17EmXfl54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxsPr7nSms_iwXxoQ14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz0nBP3D3yin9AlwsV4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzxhqPq78Z0etQ9Q1V4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwXBmGwrkktKLrdwtp4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbwgPXwIPPZN8wuoV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwfLMwSIvkY0oC7uIR4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxEvP04hmIzX7uWUwd4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTBiVio59QBK6MTcJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyZlvROiPrL_PRWbHZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses