Raw LLM Responses

You might find this comment strange and I know it won't be popular, but I trained the lora of her style that is at the moment, the most popular and most used. However here is the plot twist: I didn't do it out of spite, in fact I agree with all she said in this video, mostly big corporations making money and taking advantage of the availability of unsanctioned resourses in the net and those big corpos, as she said, are the target of the art protection software. Another thing she said is true, at the moment the loras were trained, most of her art was unprotected, and even when I could bypass the protection of those images that were (sorry or my bad English as is not my first language), even when I could bypass it, it was a manual labor thing that could be done in 1-10 image.... not something that can be realistically fixed on a big dataset. That being said. I know that I will get hate and it's understandable, but I trained her model with love, because I love her art style, as I love the style of many other artists, so I pick the best of them to create something I can use as a hobby... not a way of life, not to profit nor nothing... just as I tool I craft myself for myself, to play and experiment, combine and create something that some can call a souless copy, others a result of an algorithm, but or me.. is the way to shape what I have in my mind with words, styles, effects as digital artists uses brushes, filters, multiplayers, magic wands, layers, etc... from the eyes of an artist decades ago, both would be looked down as neither would have to mix pigments, prepare the media, wait for paint to dry to apply a new layer, master how colors combine depending on chemicals used... etc.... my point being. No matter how simplified a process it, it is the process of creationg, the emotions used, the experienced of the author what adds value... bad art can be made with real media, digital art or (artificially generated).