Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
If you think that AI will not be weaponized to enforce tyranny for the new world…
ytc_Ugze3bJIQ…
G
The issue with Scott’s comment about “new jobs are always created” doesn’t menti…
ytc_Ugwk8OEZM…
G
Building Gen AI Agents for Enterprise Beyond the Hype 2025 ✅
🔖𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐝:
It…
ytc_UgwzYzJwV…
G
Logan Lance For whom?
I am sure the american/chinese/Russian militaries or intel…
ytr_Ugzl6W1DQ…
G
Im glad I just found another artist to follow! Ur art is cool and I hate Ai too…
ytc_UgyG7-0Dt…
G
The thing with AI replacement is also that it doesn't have to be good for the co…
ytc_UgwGvqHGm…
G
@Phoboskomboa it’s so funny watching chatGPT double down when it’s wrong, just l…
ytr_UgwFGa7la…
G
If everyone used robots or ai or androids whatever you want call it for war nobo…
ytc_UgyJH1YwZ…
Comment
Here is a conclusion from Gemini when I asked if using please and thank you costs money. Conclusion:
While adding politeness words does incur a slight increase in computational cost and processing time (measured in tokens and energy consumption), the data suggests that it can be a worthwhile "cost." The potential benefits include:
Higher quality, more accurate, and more comprehensive AI responses.
Improved user satisfaction and a more natural interaction experience.
Reinforcement of positive communication habits.
Therefore, while "please" and "thank you" add a small, quantifiable cost, they often contribute to a more effective and beneficial AI interaction, potentially saving time in the long run by reducing the need for follow-up prompts or corrections due to unclear or biased responses. Sam Altman's sentiment of "tens of millions of dollars well spent – you never know" highlights this trade-off between immediate computational efficiency and the broader value of human-like interaction and improved output.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2025-07-03T00:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | approval |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxWct-DMktSzO0FFp54AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw-_AMeqC33hBX4PWN4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxBLX5twu4irnY15GZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugzt_0dLnlIxoTy0Zex4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwefRvn6ca3LMVTLYR4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy0JqEk16j_DQ14WKd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx8ls1m8GdAiwOtOfB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwx53YVL2QHIHAYltJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgywAXWpYaInx54B-AJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyAn2by2C84FDrz47x4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]